Cited by 134Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsBehavioral Health and InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Motivation and Its Relationship to Adherence to Self-monitoring and Weight Loss in a 16-week Internet Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention

Webber, Kelly H., Tate, Deborah F., Ward, Dianne S., Bowling, J. Michael·2010·Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

Abstract

Objective To examine changes in motivation and the relationship of motivation to adherence to self-monitoring and weight loss in a 16-week Internet behavioral weight-loss intervention. Design Two-group randomized design. Setting This study was conducted over the Internet. Participants Sixty-six women, ages 22-65, with a body mass index (BMI) between 25 and 40, and with a home computer with Internet access, participated. Intervention These data are from an Internet behavioral weight-loss program in which all participants received a face-to-face initial session followed by the 16-week Internet program. Main outcome measures Adherence to self-monitoring and weight loss were the main outcome measures. Analysis Linear regression and mediation analysis using the Baron and Kenny method were conducted. Results Autonomous motivation increased initially and remained high for those who ultimately achieved a 5% weight loss, but declined over time for participants who did not achieve a 5% weight loss. Autonomous motivation at 4 weeks was a predictor of adherence to self-monitoring and 16-week weight loss. Adherence mediated the relationship between autonomous motivation and weight loss. Conclusions and implications These results suggest that autonomous motivation may be a promising intervention target for promoting program procedure adherence and weight loss.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneb.2009.03.001

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is likely that adherence behaviors have shared variance and clustering because they are behavioral representations of similar constructs such as motivation.

    “For example, it is likely that adherence behaviors have shared variance and clustering given that they are behavioral representations of similar constructs such as motivation (Webber et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webber, K. H., Tate, D. F., Ward, D. S., & Bowling, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Webber, Kelly H.
Venue
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
161-167
ISSN
1499-4046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022614952
Cited by
134
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
12.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
autonomous motivation, weight loss, obesity, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Behavior Therapy, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Motivation, Patient Compliance, Self Care, Weight Loss, Exercise, Internet, Overweight, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review