Expressions of Individualization on the Internet and Social Media: Multigenerational Focus Group Study
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Growing individualization within the past decades has been described as a fundamental shift in society. Studies have reported how the digital age promotes new forms of individualism with self-tracking technologies and self-presentation in social networks. Potential harmful effects on the mental health of young adults have already been at the forefront of research. However, 2 questions that remain unanswered are how emotional experiences and expressions of self-relatedness differ among generations in their usage of the internet and social media, and if an increasing individualism can be observed by this. Objective: The aim of this study is to examine whether the use of the internet and social media has led people to be more concerned about themselves than former generations. The potential consequences of mental and emotional distress among different age groups are analyzed. Methods: A focus-group approach was chosen to study the following age groups: Baby Boomers (those born in 1950-1965), Generation X (those born in 1966-1980), and Digital Natives (those born in 1981-2000). We organized 6 focus groups with 36 participants who discussed their private usage of the internet and social media, different devices, platforms and functions, communication behavior, and self-tracking. We applied inductive category formation and followed the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) checklist. Results: We found differences in the 3 studied generations regarding the reasons for their use of the internet and social media, the effects of this use, personal feelings and experiences, expressions of self-relatedness, and social relationships. The Baby Boomers voiced a wish to stay autonomous while being in contact with their personal network. Generation X included enthusiastic members who appreciate self-tracking for curiosity and fascination, as well as people who felt fears about data surveillance. The Digital Natives reported a wish to optimize their own body by self-tracking while being faced with norms and expectations that were communicated via the internet and social media. Conclusions: All generations expressed self-relatedness, yet by different means. The Baby Boomers expressed less individualism than Generation X and the Digital Natives, who felt the highest strain due to social comparisons. However, all generations reported specific, potentially problematic consequences for their mental health. Age-specific coping strategies are necessary to promote a mentally healthy way of using the internet and social media.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is increasingly common for social media users to create all private accounts or to have separate private and public accounts.
“It is increasingly more common for social media users either to create all private accounts or to have separate private and public accounts.17–19”
From Evaluating perceptions of social media professionalism by healthcare workers (2026) · cites this paper as [19]
The Introduction (Identity in the Digital Age) discusses online self-presentation, and the Results (Self-relatedness) discusses choices about social-media use. Neither addresses private accounts, separate private and public accounts, or whether either practice is becoming more common; searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations
O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000388 · Cited by 12,211 · see citing works
Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.
Kitzinger, J. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299 · Cited by 6,939 · see citing works
Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : Grundlagen und Techniken
Mayring, P. (2003) · Cited by 6,622 · see citing works
A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research
Creswell, J. W. (2021) · Cited by 4,465 · see citing works
Risikogesellschaft auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne
Beck, U. (1986) · Cited by 4,318 · see citing works
Born digital: understanding the first generation of digital natives
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-7115 · Cited by 1,994 · see citing works
(2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315775357-68 · Cited by 1,820 · see citing works
Bullying Prevalence Across Contexts: A Meta-analysis Measuring Cyber and Traditional Bullying
Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007 · Cited by 1,216 · see citing works
The social media disorder scale
van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., Lemmens, J. S., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.038 · Cited by 948 · see citing works
Yetisen, A. K., Martinez‐Hurtado, J. L., Ünal, B., Khademhosseini, A., & Butt, H. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201706910 · Cited by 569 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In 2016, the worldwide market reached up to 125 million devices, with estimates suggesting 237 million in 2020 [27].”
BackgroundFocus group discussion: a tool for health and medical research.
Wong, L. P. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World
Yakob, R. (2009) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2501/s0265048709090490 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Neff, G., & Nafus, D. (2016) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10421.001.0001 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Die Gesellschaft der Individuen
Elias, N., & Schröter, M. (2001) · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Leung, L. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.028 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Instagram use is linked to increased symptoms of orthorexia nervosa.
Turner, P. G., & Lefevre, C. E. (2017) · Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity · doi:10.1007/s40519-017-0364-2 · Cited by 380 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Previous research on mental health and social media tended to focus on the apparent and strong effects of internet addiction due to extensive gaming [21] or eating disorders [57].”
BackgroundIs social network site usage related to depression? A meta-analysis of Facebook–depression relations
Yoon, S., Kleinman, M., Mertz, J., & Brannick, M. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.026 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Callero, P. L. (2003) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100057 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Instagram addiction and the Big Five of personality: The mediating role of self-liking
Kircaburun, K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.7.2018.15 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Côté, J. E., & Schwartz, S. J. (2002) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1006/jado.2002.0511 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Mayring, P., & Brunner, E. (2007) · Gabler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-9258-1_42 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Strübing, J. (2018) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110529920 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Problematic internet use and feelings of loneliness
Costa, R. M., Patrão, I., & Machado, M. (2018) · International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1080/13651501.2018.1539180 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
A Generational Approach to Using Emoticons as Nonverbal Communication
Krohn, F. B. (2004) · Journal of Technical Writing and Communication · doi:10.2190/9eqh-de81-cwg1-qll9 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
The generation of virtual needs: Recipes for satisfaction in social media networking
Krishen, A. S., Berezan, O., Agarwal, S., & Kachroo, P. P. E. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.120 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey
Paré, G., Leaver, C. A., & Bourget, C. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9388 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
(1994) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-91545-0 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
New Media, Web 2.0 and Surveillance
Fuchs, C. (2011) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00354.x · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Brusilovskiy, E., Townley, G., Snethen, G., & Salzer, M. S. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.036 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Hilty, D. M., Chan, S. R., Hwang, T., Wong, A., & Bauer, A. M. (2017) · mHealth · doi:10.21037/mhealth.2017.06.02 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Weiß, E. (2015) · Jahrbuch f??r P??dagogik · doi:10.3726/267059_347 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Brailovskaia, J., & Margraf, J. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191810 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Chow, T., & Wan, H.-Y. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.032 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
The Role of Perceived Loneliness in Youth Addictive Behaviors: Cross-National Survey Study
Savolainen, I., Oksanen, A., Kaakinen, M., Sirola, A., & Paek, H. (2019) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/14035 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Schröder, M. (2018) · KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1007/s11577-018-0570-6 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Smartphone, Social Media, and Mental Health App Use in an Acute Transdiagnostic Psychiatric Sample
Beard, C., Silverman, A. L., Forgeard, M., Wilmer, M. T., Torous, J., & Björgvinsson, T. (2019) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/13364 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Betts, L. R., Spenser, K. A., & Gardner, S. E. (2017) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-017-0742-2 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Losing the Traditional: Individualization and ‘Precarious Freedoms’
Beck, U., & Beck‐Gernsheim, E. (2009) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446213698.n2 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Individualization and the Life Course: Toward a Theoretical Model and Empirical Evidence
Mills, M. C. (2007) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230609259_4 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Pols, J., Willems, D. L., & Aanestad, M. (2019) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12894 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Gruppendiskussion und Fokusgruppe
Przyborski, A., & Riegler, J. (2010) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-92052-8_31 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Hahn, S. (2015) · Verlag Barbara Budrich eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvpbnpjg.21 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Almenara, C. A., Macháčková, H., & Šmahel, D. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10189 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Zwick, M. M., & Schröter, R. (2012) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-19397-7_2 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
American Academy of Advertising
(1977) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1977.10672717 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Individualisation of the life course
Hofmeister, H. (2013) · International Social Science Journal · doi:10.1111/issj.12053 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Erik H. Erikson: Identität und Lebenszyklus
Noack, J. (2010) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-92196-9_3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Borkenhagen, A., Brähler, E., & Ach, J. S. (2012) · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-Identity and Its Discontents: Sociology in the 1990s
Skinner, D., May, V., & Rollock, N. (2016) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038515621245 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Generation Me: Soziale Medien und Narzissmus
Brailovskaia, J., & Bierhoff, H. (2019) · PiD - Psychotherapie im Dialog · doi:10.1055/a-0771-7047 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Psychosoziale Arbeitsbedingungen und mentale Gesundheit der Babyboomergeneration
Tophoven, S., Tisch, A., Rauch, A., et al. (2015) · Das Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1055/s-0034-1398596 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Haller, Michael: Was wollt Ihr eigentlich? Die schöne neue Welt der Generation Y.
Mahrt, M. (2016) · Publizistik · doi:10.1007/s11616-016-0268-6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Olpinska-Szkielko, M., Grucza, S., Berdychowska, Z., et al. (2016) · Peter Lang eBooks · doi:10.3726/978-3-653-01336-8/61 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Steinbach, A. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-20978-0_26 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Identität – sich selbst zum Objekt machen
Abels, H. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-14155-4_16 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [32]Steinbach A Kopp J Steinbach A Generation Grundbegriffe der Soziologie 2018 Wiesbaden Springer Fachmedien 129 131
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluating perceptions of social media professionalism by healthcare workers
Dalton, C., Sarwar, Z., Garwe, T., & Hunter, C. J. (2026) · DIGITAL HEALTH · doi:10.1177/20552076251411281 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“19 As the digital age advances and people are chronically online, there is a growing sentiment that our lives should not be publicly on display at all times.”
- Authors
- Mayer, G., Alvarez, S., Gronewold, N., & Schultz, J.-H.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
- Texas A&M University – Central Texas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mayer, Gwendolyn
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2020-11-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e20528
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7673976
- OpenAlex
- W3097276661
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (FKZ 13GW0157B)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Keywords
- individualism, social media use, internet use, self-tracking, self-presentation, generational differences, baby boomers, Generation X, digital natives, social comparison, mental health, emotional distress, dataveillance, self-relatedness, coping strategies
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Focus Groups, Internet, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review