Cited by 78Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Effects of a Mobile and web app (thought spot) on mental health help-seeking among college and university students: randomized controlled trial

Open access
Wiljer, David, Shi, Jenny, Lo, Brian, Sanches, Marcos, Hollenberg, Elisa, Johnson, Andrew, Abi-Jaoudé, Alexxa, Chaim, Gloria +7 more·2020·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mental health disorders are the most prevalent health issues among postsecondary students, yet few solutions to this emerging crisis exist. While mobile health technologies are touted as promising solutions for the unmet mental health needs of these students, the efficacy of these tools remains unclear. In response to these gaps, this study evaluates Thought Spot, a mobile and web app created through participatory design research. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the research is to examine the impact of Thought Spot on mental health and wellness help-seeking intentions, behaviors, attitudes, self-stigma, and self-efficacy among postsecondary students in Canada. METHODS: A 2-armed randomized controlled trial involving students from three postsecondary institutions was conducted. Students were eligible if they were aged 17 to 29 years, enrolled in full-time or part-time studies, functionally competent in English, and had access to a compatible digital device. The usual care group received a mental health services information pamphlet. The intervention group received the Thought Spot app on their digital device. Thought Spot is a standalone app that allows users to add, review, and search crowdsourced information about nearby mental health and wellness services. Users can also track their mood on the app. Outcomes were self-assessed through questionnaires collected at baseline and 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome was change in formal help-seeking intentions from baseline to 6 months, measured by the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire. A mixed-effects model was used to compare the impact of usual care and intervention on the primary outcome (formal help-seeking intentions). Secondary outcomes included changes in informal help-seeking intentions and help-seeking behaviors, help-seeking attitudes, self-stigma, and self-efficacy. RESULTS: =23.52; P<.001, f=0.21). Compared with males, females sought more help from formal resources (OR 1.86; 95% CI 1.22 to 2.83, P=.001). Females were less likely to seek help from informal sources than males (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.73, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prompting postsecondary students about mental health and help-seeking appears to increase help-seeking intentions. mHealth interventions may be as effective as information pamphlets in increasing formal help-seeking but may confer a small advantage in driving help-seeking from informal sources. Although there is enthusiasm, developers and health policy experts should exercise caution and thoroughly evaluate these types of digital tools. Future studies should explore the cost-effectiveness of digital interventions and develop strategies for improving their efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03412461; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03412461. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/resprot.6446.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/20790

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Thought Spot app did not change help-seeking intentions.

    “Although this app, did not change help-seeking intentions”

    From The impact of digital interventions on help-seeking behaviour for mental health problems: a systematic literature review (2022) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Results (Primary Outcome: Change in Formal Help-Seeking Intentions) found no significant difference in change between the Thought Spot and pamphlet groups. But intentions increased significantly in both groups, including the Thought Spot group. The claim is supported as a statement about no additional effect relative to the comparator, not as a statement that intentions did not change. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [38]Cohen J Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edition 1988 Hillsdale Lawrence Erlbaum

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiljer, D., Shi, J., Lo, B., Sanches, M., Hollenberg, E., Johnson, A., Abi-Jaoudé, A., Chaim, G., Cleverley, K., Henderson, J., Isaranuwatchai, W., Levinson, A., Robb, J., Wong, H. W., & Voineskos, A.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Wiljer, David
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2020-10-30
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
e20790
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094654492
Cited by
78
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (143558_1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
mental health help-seeking, university students, mobile health apps, help-seeking intentions, help-seeking attitudes, self-stigma, self-efficacy, mood tracking, gender differences in help-seeking, participatory design, mental health promotion, wellness services, postsecondary students, information booklet, digital mental health interventions, Canada
MeSH terms
Help-Seeking Behavior, Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Universities, Telemedicine, Young Adult, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review