Cited by 18Digital Mental Health InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Young People’s Attitude Toward Positive Psychology Interventions: Thematic Analysis

Open access
Michel, Toni, Tachtler, Franziska, Slovak, Petr, Fitzpatrick, Geraldine·2020·JMIR Human Factors

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Digital instantiations of positive psychology intervention (PPI) principles have been proposed to combat the current global youth mental health crisis; however, young people are largely not engaging with available resources. Objective: The aim of this study is to explore young people’s attitudes toward various PPI principles to find ways of making digital instantiations of them more engaging. Methods: We conducted an explorative workshop with 30 young people (aged 16-21 years). They rated and reviewed 29 common PPIs. Ratings and recorded discussions were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Some interventions were conflicting with young people’s values or perceived as too difficult. Participants responded positively to interventions that fit them personally and allowed them to use their strengths. Conclusions: Values, context, strengths, and other personal factors are entangled with young people’s attitudes toward digital instantiations of PPI principles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/21145

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent study showed that youth preference regarding psychological interventions for emotional problems revolves around a balance between the medical model of mental health and growth positive models.

    “A recent study showed that youth’s preference regarding psychological interventions for emotional problems revolves around a balance between the medical model of mental health, oriented to solving problems and the growth positive models”

    From Use of automated conversational agents in improving young population mental health: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Introduction (Background; page not listed) contrasts a disease model focused on resolving problems with positive psychology’s focus on strengths and growth. But the Discussion (Principal Findings; page not listed) says young people’s intervention preferences were diverse and individual; it does not find that their preferences revolve around a balance between those two models. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]Seligman M Csikszentmihalyi M Positive psychology: an introduction Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology 2014 New York, USA Springer

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michel, T., Tachtler, F., Slovak, P., & Fitzpatrick, G.
Affiliations
TU Wien (AT)
Corresponding author
Michel, Toni
Venue
JMIR Human Factors
Published
2020-11-09
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
e21145
ISSN
2292-9495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092040031
Cited by
17
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Human Factors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission (HORIZON2020, 722561)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
positive psychology interventions, youth mental health, young people's attitudes, digital interventions, values, personal strengths, intervention design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review