Cited by 12Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Effectiveness of an Internet-Based Machine-Guided Stress Management Program Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Improving Depression Among Workers: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Kawakami, Norito, Imamura, Kotaro, Watanabe, Kazuhiro, Sekiya, Yuki, Sasaki, Natsu, Sato, Nana, SMART-CBT Project Team·2021·JMIR Research Protocols

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: The effect of an unguided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) stress management program on depression may be enhanced by applying artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to guide participants adopting the program. Objective: The aim of this study is to describe a research protocol to investigate the effect of a newly developed iCBT stress management program adopting AI technologies on improving depression among healthy workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This study is a two-arm, parallel, randomized controlled trial. Participants (N=1400) will be recruited, and those who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to the intervention or control (treatment as usual) group. A 6-week, six-module, internet-based stress management program, SMART-CBT, has been developed that includes machine-guided exercises to help participants acquire CBT skills, and it applies machine learning and deep learning technologies. The intervention group will participate in the program for 10 weeks. The primary outcome, depression, will be measured using the Beck Depression Inventory II at baseline and 3- and 6-month follow-ups. A mixed model repeated measures analysis will be used to test the intervention effect (group × time interactions) in the total sample (universal prevention) on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: The study was at the stage of recruitment of participants at the time of submission. The data analysis related to the primary outcome will start in January 2022, and the results might be published in 2022 or 2023. Conclusions: This is the first study to investigate the effectiveness of a fully automated machine-guided iCBT program for improving subthreshold depression among workers using a randomized controlled trial design. The study will explore the potential of a machine-guided stress management program that can be disseminated online to a large number of workers with minimal cost in the post–COVID-19 era. Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry(UMIN-CTR) UMIN000043897; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050125 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/30305

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/30305

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study that used AI in cognitive behavioral therapy to alleviate workers' depression guided the program in a group format, which did not account for individual characteristics.

    “One study that used AI in cognitive behavioral therapy to alleviate workers' depression, guided the program in a group format (Kawakami et al. 2021), which did not account for individual characteristics.”

    From <scp>AI</scp>‐Assisted Tailored Intervention for Nurse Burnout: A Three‐Group Randomized Controlled Trial (2025) · cites this paper as Kawakami et al. 2021

    The Methods > Intervention passage describes personalized predictions and messages based on each participant’s stressors and emotional reactions, contrary to the claim that the program did not account for individual characteristics. The paper describes an AI-guided CBT program for workers, but its Abstract > Objective identifies it as a trial protocol, not a completed demonstration that it alleviated depression. The cited passages have no page numbers in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One study used AI in stress management programs.

    “However, 1 study used AI in stress management programs [65].”
  • In that study, AI algorithms were used only to guide programs and programs were conducted in group settings, thus overlooking diversity.

    “AI algorithms were used only to guide programs and programs were conducted in group settings, thus overlooking the aspect of diversity.”
  • No previous study has incorporated AI to provide tailored programs to users to reduce burnout.

    “To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has incorporated AI to provide tailored programs to users to reduce burnout.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [53]American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition: DSM-5 2013 Arlington, VA American Psychiatric Publishing

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawakami, N., Imamura, K., Watanabe, K., Sekiya, Y., Sasaki, N., Sato, N., & SMART-CBT Project Team
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Kitasato University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kawakami, Norito
Venue
JMIR Research Protocols
Published
2021-09-29
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
e30305
ISSN
1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3191520835
Cited by
12
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18H04072, 20K19671, 17K15849)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, stress management, depression, subthreshold depression, artificial intelligence, deep learning, machine learning, workers, workplace mental health, COVID-19 pandemic, universal prevention, online intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review