The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Therapeutic Potential of Social Chatbots in Alleviating Loneliness and Social Anxiety: Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) social chatbots represent a major advancement in merging technology with mental health, offering benefits through natural and emotional communication. Unlike task-oriented chatbots, social chatbots build relationships and provide social support, which can positively impact mental health outcomes like loneliness and social anxiety. However, the specific effects and mechanisms through which these chatbots influence mental health remain underexplored. Objective: This study explores the mental health potential of AI social chatbots, focusing on their impact on loneliness and social anxiety among university students. The study seeks to (i) assess the impact of engaging with an AI social chatbot in South Korea, "Luda Lee," on these mental health outcomes over a 4-week period and (ii) analyze user experiences to identify perceived strengths and weaknesses, as well as the applicability of social chatbots in therapeutic contexts. Methods: A single-group pre-post study was conducted with university students who interacted with the chatbot for 4 weeks. Measures included loneliness, social anxiety, and mood-related symptoms such as depression, assessed at baseline, week 2, and week 4. Quantitative measures were analyzed using analysis of variance and stepwise linear regression to identify the factors affecting change. Thematic analysis was used to analyze user experiences and assess the perceived benefits and challenges of chatbots. Results: A total of 176 participants (88 males, average age=22.6 (SD 2.92)) took part in the study. Baseline measures indicated slightly elevated levels of loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale, mean 27.97, SD (11.07)) and social anxiety (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, mean 25.3, SD (14.19)) compared to typical university students. Significant reductions were observed as loneliness decreasing by week 2 (t175=2.55, P=.02) and social anxiety decreasing by week 4 (t175=2.67, P=.01). Stepwise linear regression identified baseline loneliness (β=0.78, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.89), self-disclosure (β=–0.65, 95% CI –1.07 to –0.23) and resilience (β=0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.13) as significant predictors of week 4 loneliness (R2=0.64). Baseline social anxiety (β=0.92, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.03) significantly predicted week 4 anxiety (R2=0.65). These findings indicate higher baseline loneliness, lower self-disclosure to the chatbot, and higher resilience significantly predicted higher loneliness at week 4. Additionally, higher baseline social anxiety significantly predicted higher social anxiety at week 4. Qualitative analysis highlighted the chatbot's empathy and support as features for reliability, though issues such as inconsistent responses and excessive enthusiasm occasionally disrupted user immersion. Conclusions: Social chatbots may have the potential to mitigate feelings of loneliness and social anxiety, indicating their possible utility as complementary resources in mental health interventions. User insights emphasize the importance of empathy, accessibility, and structured conversations in achieving therapeutic goals. Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) KCT0009288; https://tinyurl.com/hxrznt3t
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI companions are increasingly marketed and studied as remedies for loneliness.
“AI companions are increasingly marketed and studied as remedies for loneliness (De Freitas et al. 2025;Kim et al. 2025;Sullivan et al. 2023).”
From Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions (2026) · cites this paper as Kim et al. 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.10113 · Cited by 11,793
UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure
Russell, D. W. (1996) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2 · Cited by 5,800
Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.7785 · Cited by 2,730
Psychometric properties of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale
HEIMBERG, R. G., HORNER, K. J., JUSTER, H. R., SAFREN, S. A., BROWN, E. J., SCHNEIER, F. R., & LIEBOWITZ, M. R. (1999) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291798007879 · Cited by 968
Fiske, A., Henningsen, P., & Buyx, A. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/13216 · Cited by 857
Fulmer, R., Joerin, A., Gentile, B., Lakerink, L., & Rauws, M. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.9782 · Cited by 715
Ho, A., Hancock, J., & Miner, A. S. (2018) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqy026 · Cited by 629
Exploring relationship development with social chatbots: A mixed-method study of replika
Pentina, I., Hancock, T., & Xie, T. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107600 · Cited by 522
A Literature Survey of Recent Advances in Chatbots
Caldarini, G., Jaf, S., & McGarry, K. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13010041 · Cited by 470
Loneliness over time: The crucial role of social anxiety.
Lim, M. H., Rodebaugh, T. L., Zyphur, M. J., & Gleeson, J. F. M. (2016) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000162 · Cited by 443
Lee, S., & Choi, J. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.005 · Cited by 388
Self-citationValidation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and GAD-2 in patients with migraine
Seo, J.-G., & Park, S.-P. (2015) · The Journal of Headache and Pain · doi:10.1186/s10194-015-0583-8 · Cited by 341
Reporting Mental Health Symptoms: Breaking Down Barriers to Care with Virtual Human Interviewers
Lucas, G. M., Rizzo, A., Gratch, J., Scherer, S., Stratou, G., Boberg, J., & Morency, L.-P. (2017) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2017.00051 · Cited by 308
Croes, E. A. J., & Antheunis, M. L. (2021) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407520959463 · Cited by 291
Effectiveness of an Empathic Chatbot in Combating Adverse Effects of Social Exclusion on Mood
de Gennaro, M., Krumhuber, E. G., & Lucas, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03061 · Cited by 265
A longitudinal study of human–chatbot relationships
Skjuve, M., Følstad, A., Fostervold, K. I., & Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102903 · Cited by 253
Loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots
Maples, B., Cerit, M., Vishwanath, A., & Pea, R. (2024) · npj Mental Health Research · doi:10.1038/s44184-023-00047-6 · Cited by 250
Xie, T., & Pentina, I. (2022) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2022.258 · Cited by 219
Maintaining reality: Relational agents for antipsychotic medication adherence
Bickmore, T. W., Puskar, K., Schlenk, E. A., Pfeifer, L. M., & Sereika, S. M. (2010) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.02.001 · Cited by 213
Social anxiety disorder in childhood and adolescence: Current status and future directions
Kashdan, T. B., & Herbert, J. D. (2001) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1009576610507 · Cited by 205
Gardiner, P. M., McCue, K. D., Negash, L. M., Cheng, T., White, L. F., Yinusa-Nyahkoon, L., Jack, B. W., & Bickmore, T. W. (2017) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.015 · Cited by 139
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30230-X · DOI
- 10.2196/mental.9782 · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, C, 2023, Reading Matrix, 23
- 10.21509/kjys.2019.10.26.10.53 · DOI
- 10.15842/kjcp.2007.26.1.015 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
- Lee, HH, 2003, Korean J Clin Psychol, 22, 935
- Park, SJ, 2010, Anxiety and Mood, 6, 119
- 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3928/19404921-20150806-72 · DOI
- 10.4306/pi.2010.7.2.109 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.53841/bpsqmip.2022.1.33.46 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/su142416456 · DOI
- Kim, W, 2012, Korean J Social Welfare Educ, 20, 203
- 10.15818/ihss.2023.24.2.251 · DOI
- 10.1080/00207411.2022.2046924 · DOI
- 10.1080/00049530.2021.1904498 · DOI
- 10.1111/1540-4560.00246 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00040-2 · DOI
- 10.2307/1126465 · DOI
- Fraser, M, 1997, Risk and Resilience: An Ecological Perspective
- 10.1007/s00607-013-0352-y · DOI
- 10.1080/10447318.2022.2150745 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ebner, P., & Szczuka, J. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.00195 · Cited by 33
The compassion illusion: can artificial empathy ever be emotionally authentic?
K. G., A., & Joseph, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1723149 · Cited by 24
Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions
Ciriello, R., Gal, U., & Turel, O. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.12476 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, M., Lee, S., Kim, S., Heo, J.-I., Lee, S., Shin, Y.-B., Cho, C.-H., & Jung, D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2025-01-14
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- e65589
- ISSN
- 1438-8871
- PMC
- PMC11775481
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 23
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review