Cited by 219Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationDigital Mental Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Engagement in a Diabetes Self-management Website: Usage Patterns and Generalizability of Program Use

Open access
Glasgow, Russell E, Christiansen, Steven M, Kurz, Deanna, King, Diane K, Woolley, Tim, Faber, Andrew J, Estabrooks, Paul A, Strycker, Lisa, Toobert, Deborah, Dickman, Jennifer·2011·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased access to the Internet and the availability of efficacious eHealth interventions offer great promise for assisting adults with diabetes to change and maintain health behaviors. A key concern is whether levels of engagement in Internet programs are sufficient to promote and sustain behavior change. OBJECTIVE: This paper used automated data from an ongoing Internet-based diabetes self-management intervention study to calculate various indices of website engagement. The multimedia website involved goal setting, action planning, and self-monitoring as well as offering features such as "Ask an Expert" to enhance healthy eating, physical activity, and medication adherence. We also investigated participant characteristics associated with website engagement and the relationship between website use and 4-month behavioral and health outcomes. METHODS: We report on participants in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) who were randomized to receive (1) the website alone (n = 137) or (2) the website plus human support (n = 133) that included additional phone calls and group meetings. The website was available in English and Spanish and included features to enhance engagement and user experience. A number of engagement variables were calculated for each participant including number of log-ins, number of website components visited at least twice, number of days entering self-monitoring data, number of visits to the "Action Plan" section, and time on the website. Key outcomes included exercise, healthy eating, and medication adherence as well as body mass index (BMI) and biological variables related to cardiovascular disease risk. RESULTS: Of the 270 intervention participants, the average age was 60, the average BMI was 34.9 kg/m², 130 (48%) were female, and 62 (23%) self-reported Latino ethnicity. The number of participant visits to the website over 4 months ranged from 1 to 119 (mean 28 visits, median 18). Usage decreased from 70% of participants visiting at least weekly during the first 6 weeks to 47% during weeks 7 to 16. There were no significant differences between website only and website plus support conditions on most of the engagement variables. In total, 75% of participants entered self-monitoring data at least once per week. Exercise action plan pages were visited more often than medication taking and healthy eating pages (mean of 4.3 visits vs 2.8 and 2.0 respectively, P < .001). Spearman nonparametric correlations indicated few significant associations between patient characteristics and summary website engagement variables, and key factors such as ethnicity, baseline computer use, age, health literacy, and education were not related to use. Partial correlations indicated that engagement, especially in self-monitoring, was most consistently related to improvement in healthy eating (r = .20, P = .04) and reduction of dietary fat (r = -.31, P = .001). There was also a significant correlation between self-monitoring and improvement in exercise (r = .20, P = .033) but not with medication taking. CONCLUSIONS: Participants visited the website fairly often and used all of the theoretically important sections, but engagement decreased over 4 months. Usage rates and patterns were similar for a wide range of participants, which has encouraging implications for the potential reach of online interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00987285; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00987285 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5vpe4RHTV).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.1391

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Boren, SA, 2006, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 2006, 51
  2. Lorig, K, 2000, Living a healthy life with chronic conditions
  3. Thompson, FE, 1998, Eur J Clin Nutr, 52, S63
  4. Srimanunthiphol, J, 2000, Hawaii Med J, 59, 295
  5. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30425.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–219 of 219

Metadata

Authors
Glasgow, R. E., Christiansen, S. M., Kurz, D., King, D. K., Woolley, T., Faber, A. J., Estabrooks, P. A., Strycker, L., Toobert, D., & Dickman, J.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • InterVision Media (United States) (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Oregon Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Glasgow, Russell E
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2011-01-25
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
e9
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999611855
Cited by
219
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 14
FWCI
39.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK035524)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
diabetes self-management, digital health interventions, website engagement, usage patterns, self-monitoring, goal setting, action planning, medication adherence, physical activity, healthy eating, human support, body mass index, Hispanic patients, health literacy, computer use, Spanish-language websites, behavior maintenance
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Self Care, Social Support, Time Factors, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Health Behavior, Body Mass Index, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review