Cited by 195Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Methodological Challenges in Online Trials

Open access
Murray, Elizabeth, Khadjesari, Zarnie, White, Ian R, Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria, Godfrey, Christine, McCambridge, Jim, Thompson, Simon G, Wallace, Paul·2009·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

Health care and health care services are increasingly being delivered over the Internet. There is a strong argument that interventions delivered online should also be evaluated online to maximize the trial's external validity. Conducting a trial online can help reduce research costs and improve some aspects of internal validity. To date, there are relatively few trials of health interventions that have been conducted entirely online. In this paper we describe the major methodological issues that arise in trials (recruitment, randomization, fidelity of the intervention, retention, and data quality), consider how the online context affects these issues, and use our experience of one online trial evaluating an intervention to help hazardous drinkers drink less (DownYourDrink) to illustrate potential solutions. Further work is needed to develop online trial methodology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.1052

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, E., Khadjesari, Z., White, I. R., Kalaitzaki, E., Godfrey, C., McCambridge, J., Thompson, S. G., & Wallace, P.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • MRC Biostatistics Unit (GB)
  • Medical Research Council (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Murray, Elizabeth
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2009-04-03
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
e9
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165002752
Cited by
195
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
FWCI
15.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • British Heart Foundation (RG/08/014/24067)
  • Diabetes UK
  • Alcohol Change UK
  • Medical Research Council (U.1052.00.006, U.1052.00.001)
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
online trials, online intervention, clinical trial design, participant recruitment, randomization, intervention fidelity, participant retention, data quality, generalizability, internal validity, hazardous drinking
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Online Systems, Reproducibility of Results, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review