Cited by 92Social Media in Health EducationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsBehavioral Health and Interventions

Are Social Networking Sites Making Health Behavior Change Interventions More Effective? A Meta-Analytic Review

Yang, Qinghua·2017·Journal of Health Communication

Abstract

The increasing popularity of social networking sites (SNSs) has drawn scholarly attention in recent years, and a large amount of efforts have been made in applying SNSs to health behavior change interventions. However, these interventions showed mixed results, with a large variance of effect sizes in Cohen's d ranging from -1.17 to 1.28. To provide a better understanding of SNS-based interventions' effectiveness, a meta-analysis of 21 studies examining the effects of health interventions using SNS was conducted. Results indicated that health behavior change interventions using SNS are effective in general, but the effects were moderated by health topic, methodological features, and participant features. Theoretical and practical implications of findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10810730.2016.1271065

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The easy accessibility and cost efficiency of mobile features may help prevent diminishing intervention effects compared with those that use other types of new media.

    “The easy accessibility and cost efficiency of mobile features may help prevent diminishing intervention effects compared with those that use other types of new media [33].”
  • A meta-analysis on health interventions using social networking sites reported that studies using a true control condition without giving any intervention had a significantly higher weighted mean effect size than studies giving an alternative intervention to the control group.

    “Specifically, a meta-analysis on health interventions using social networking sites reported that studies using a true control condition without giving any intervention had a significantly higher weighted mean ES than studies giving an alternative intervention to the control group [33].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, Q.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Yang, Qinghua
Venue
Journal of Health Communication
Published
2017-02-16
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
223-233
ISSN
  • 1081-0730 (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0415
OpenAlex
W2588360892
Cited by
92
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4
FWCI
7.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
social networking sites, health behavior change interventions, intervention effectiveness, health topics, methodological characteristics, participant characteristics, moderators of effect size
MeSH terms
Health Promotion, Humans, Program Evaluation, Health Behavior, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Internet, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review