Cited by 55Digital Mental Health InterventionsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMental Health Treatment and Access

e-CBT (myCompass), Antidepressant Medication, and Face-to-Face Psychological Treatment for Depression in Australia: A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison

Open access
Solomon, Daniela, Proudfoot, Judith, Clarke, Janine, Christensen, Helen·2015·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The economic cost of depression is becoming an ever more important determinant for health policy and decision makers. Internet-based interventions with and without therapist support have been found to be effective options for the treatment of mild to moderate depression. With increasing demands on health resources and shortages of mental health care professionals, the integration of cost-effective treatment options such as Internet-based programs into primary health care could increase efficiency in terms of resource use and costs. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an Internet-based intervention (myCompass) for the treatment of mild-to-moderate depression compared to treatment as usual and cognitive behavior therapy in a stepped care model. METHODS: A decision model was constructed using a cost utility framework to show both costs and health outcomes. In accordance with current treatment guidelines, a stepped care model included myCompass as the first low-intervention step in care for a proportion of the model cohort, with participants beginning from a low-intensity intervention to increasing levels of treatment. Model parameters were based on data from the recent randomized controlled trial of myCompass, which showed that the intervention reduced symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress and improved work and social functioning for people with symptoms in the mild-to-moderate range. RESULTS: The average net monetary benefit (NMB) was calculated, identifying myCompass as the strategy with the highest net benefit. The mean incremental NMB per individual for the myCompass group was AUD 1165.88 compared to treatment as usual and AUD 522.58 for the cognitive behavioral therapy model. CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based interventions can provide cost-effective access to treatment when provided as part of a stepped care model. Widespread dissemination of Internet-based programs can potentially reduce demands on primary and tertiary services and reduce unmet need.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.4207

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Internet-delivered (eHealth) prevention programs can provide a cost-effective alternative to traditional approaches by enabling wider dissemination and scalability of effective preventative strategies.

    “Internet-delivered (eHealth) prevention programs can provide a cost-effective alternative to traditional approaches, by enabling wider dissemination and scalability of effective preventative strategies [4].”

    From A pilot evaluation of a smartphone application for workplace depression (2020) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Discussion (Conclusion) reports that myCompass was cost-effective compared with usual care and face-to-face CBT, and says wider dissemination could reduce unmet need. The paper evaluates treatment for depression, not prevention programs or preventative strategies, so the claim extends its finding beyond the studied use. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solomon, D., Proudfoot, J., Clarke, J., & Christensen, H.
Affiliations
Black Dog Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Solomon, Daniela
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2015-11-11
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
e255
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097354268
Cited by
55
References
65
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Australian Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, cost-effectiveness, stepped care, antidepressants, cognitive behavioral therapy, mild to moderate depression, primary care, net monetary benefit, decision models, mental health services
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Australia, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review