Cited by 60Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Improving Cost-effectiveness and Access to Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Depression: Providing Remote-Ready, Computer-Assisted Psychotherapy in Times of Crisis and Beyond

Open access
Thase, Michael E., McCrone, Paul, Barrett, Marna S., Eells, Tracy D., Wisniewski, Stephen R., Balasubramani, G.K., Brown, Gregory K., Wright, Jesse H.·2020·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

Introduction: There is growing evidence that computer-delivered or computer-assisted forms of cognitive behavior therapy (CCBT) are helpful, but cost-effectiveness versus standard therapies is not well established. Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a therapist-supported method for CCBT in comparison to standard cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). Methods: A total of 154 drug-free major depressive disorder outpatients were randomly assigned to either 16 weeks of standard CBT (up to twenty 50-min sessions) or CCBT using the Good Days Ahead program (including up to 5.5 h of therapist contact). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, weeks 8 and 16, and at 3 and 6 months post-treatment. Economic analyses took into account the costs of services received and work/social role impairment. Results: In the context of almost identical efficacy, a form of CCBT that used only about one third the amount of therapist contact as conventional CBT was highly cost-effective compared to conventional therapy and reduced the adjusted cost of treatment by USD 945 per patient. Conclusions: A method of CCBT that blended internet-delivered modules and abbreviated therapeutic contact reduced the cost of treatment substantially without adversely affecting outcomes. Results suggest that use of this approach can more than double the access to CBT. Because clinician support in CCBT can be provided by telephone, videoconference, and/or email, this highly efficient form of treatment could be a major advance in remote treatment delivery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000508143

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [22]First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient/Non-patient Edition (SCID-I/P w/PSY SCREEN). New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 2015.
  2. [26]Wright JH, Brown GK, Thase ME, Basco MR. Learning Cognitive-Behavior Therapy: An Illustrated Guide – Second Edition. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, 2017.
  3. [28]Thase ME, Reynolds CF III, Frank E, Response to cognitive behavior therapy in chronic depression. J Psychother Pract Res. 1994; 3: 204– 214.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thase, M. E., McCrone, P., Barrett, M. S., Eells, T. D., Wisniewski, S. R., Balasubramani, G. K., Brown, G. K., & Wright, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2020
Volume
89
Issue
5
Pages
307-313
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W3025959868
Cited by
60
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH082794, R01MH082762)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
cost-effectiveness, major depressive disorder, therapist contact, online therapy, remote treatment delivery, access to mental health care
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Quality of Life, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review