Cited by 43Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchChronic Disease Management Strategies

Benefits of diabetes self-management for health plan members: a 6-month translation study

Open access
Lorig, Kate, Ritter, Philip L, Turner, Ralph M, English, Kathleen, Laurent, Diana D, Greenberg, Jay·2016·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes self-management education has been shown to be effective in controlled trials. However, few programs that meet American Association of Diabetes Educators standards have been translated into widespread practice. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the translation of the evidence-based Better Choices, Better Health-Diabetes program in both Internet and face-to-face versions. METHODS: We administered the Internet program nationally in the United States (n=1010). We conducted face-to-face workshops in Atlanta, Georgia; Indianapolis, Indiana; and St. Louis, Missouri (n=232). Self-report questionnaires collected health indicator, health behavior, and health care utilization measures. Questionnaires were administered on the Web or by mail. We determined hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from blood samples collected via mailed kits. Paired t tests determined whether changes between baseline and 6 months differed significantly from no change. Subgroup analyses determined whether participants with specific conditions benefited (high HbA1c, depression, hypoglycemia, nonadherence to medication taking, and no aerobic exercise). We calculated the percentage of participants with improvements of at least 0.4 effect size in at least one of the 5 above measures. RESULTS: Of the 1242 participants, 884 provided 6-month follow-up questionnaires. There were statistically significant improvements in 6 of 7 health indicators (including HbA1c) and in 7 of 7 behaviors. For each of the 5 conditions, there were significant improvements among those with the condition (effect sizes 0.59-1.1). A total of 662 (75.0%) of study participants improved at least 0.4 effect size in at least one criterion, and 327 (37.1%) improved in 2 or more. CONCLUSIONS: The Diabetes Self-Management Program, offered in two modes, was successfully disseminated to a heterogeneous national population of members of either insured or administered health plans. Participants had small but significant benefits in multiple measures. The program appears effective in improving diabetes management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.5568

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lorig, K., Ritter, P. L., Turner, R. M., English, K., Laurent, D. D., & Greenberg, J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Carelon Research (United States) (US)
  • Anthem (United States) (US)
  • National Council on Aging (US)
Corresponding author
Ritter, Philip L
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2016-06-24
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
e164
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2467159028
Cited by
43
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
diabetes self-management education, program dissemination, health plans, health insurance beneficiaries, HbA1c, glycemic control, health behavior, health care utilization, depression, hypoglycemia, medication adherence, aerobic exercise, online intervention, face-to-face workshops
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Georgia, Health Status Indicators, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Indiana, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Health Behavior, Exercise, Internet, Medication Adherence, Translational Research, Biomedical, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review