Cited by 13Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsInnovations in Medical Education

A digital tool to promote alcohol and drug use screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment skill translation: A mobile app development and randomized controlled trial protocol

Open access
Satre, Derek D, Ly, Khanh, Wamsley, Maria, Curtis, Alexa, Satterfield, Jason·2017·JMIR Research Protocols

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Translation of knowledge and skills from classroom settings to clinical practice is a major challenge in healthcare training, especially for behavioral interventions. For example, screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) is a highly-promoted approach to identifying and treating individuals at risk for alcohol or drug problems, yet effective, routine use of SBIRT has lagged. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to describe the development, pilot testing, and trial protocol of a mobile app based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to promote SBIRT skill translation and application. METHODS: Intended for use after classroom training occurs, the mobile app has three primary functions designed to increase behavioral intent to deliver SBIRT: (1) review skills (ie, address knowledge and beliefs about SBIRT), (2) apply skills with patients (ie, build confidence and perceived behavioral control), and (3) report performance data (ie, increase accountability and social norms and/or influence). The app includes depression and anxiety screening tools due to high comorbidity with substance use. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is in progress among health and social service learners (N=200) recruited from 3 universities and 6 different training programs in nursing, social work, internal medicine, psychiatry, and psychology. Participants are randomized to SBIRT classroom instruction alone or classroom instruction plus app access prior to beginning their field placement rotations. TPB-based data are collected via Qualtrics or via the mobile app pre-post and SBIRT utilization, weekly for 10 weeks. Key outcomes include the frequency of and self-reported confidence in delivery of SBIRT. RESULTS: Beta testing with advanced practice nursing students (N=22) indicated that the app and its associated assessment tools were acceptable and useful. The system usability scale (SUS) mean was 65.8 (n=19), which indicated that the SBIRT app was acceptable but could benefit from improvement. Indeed, modifications were implemented prior to starting the trial. Enrollment of trial participants began in September 2016. Results are expected by December 2017. CONCLUSIONS: This report describes the process of TPB-based app development and testing, and the protocol for a RCT to determine the effectiveness of the app in enhancing skill translation. If effective, this approach could improve SBIRT implementation, fidelity, and clinical outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/resprot.7070

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a few technology products for substance use care with provider-facing aspects have undergone usability testing.

    “Despite their promise, only a few technology products for substance use care with provider-facing aspects have undergone usability testing (Levesque et al., 2018; O’Grady et al., 2019; Satre et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [47]American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) 2013 Arlington, VA American Psychiatric Publishing
  2. [54]Maurer D iMedicalApps 2016 2016-11-07 Review of UCSF OHN SBIRT app, evidence based intervention for substance abuse http://www.imedicalapps.com/2016/08/ucsf-ohn-sbirt-app-evidence-based-intervention-substance-abuse/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Satre, D. D., Ly, K., Wamsley, M., Curtis, A., & Satterfield, J.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Satre, Derek D
Venue
JMIR Research Protocols
Published
2017-04-18
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
e55
ISSN
1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2606829887
Cited by
13
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
SBIRT, mobile application, theory of planned behavior, clinical teaching, alcohol screening, substance use screening, perceived behavioral control, implementation fidelity, advanced practice nursing students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review