Cited by 6Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsUsability and User Interface DesignDigital Mental Health Interventions

Point-of-care mobile application to guide health care professionals in conducting substance use screening and intervention: A mixed-methods user experience study

Open access
O'Grady, Megan, Kapoor, Sandeep, Gilmer, Evan, Neighbors, Charles, Conigliaro, Joseph, Kwon, Nancy, Morgenstern, Jon·2019·ACI Open

Abstract

Background Well-documented barriers have limited the widespread, sustained adoption of screening and intervention for substance use problems in health care settings. mHealth applications may address provider-related barriers; however, there is limited research on development and user experience of such applications. Objective This user experience study examines a provider-focused point-of-care app for substance use screening and intervention in health care settings. Method This mixed-methods study included think-aloud tasks, task success ratings, semistructured interviews, and usability questionnaires (e.g., System Usability Scale [SUS]) to examine user experience among 12 health coaches who provide substance use services in emergency department and primary care settings. Results The average rate of successful task completion was 94% and the mean SUS score was 76 out of 100. Qualitative data suggested the app enhanced participants' capability to complete tasks efficiently and effectively. Participants reported being satisfied with the app's features, content, screen layout, and navigation and felt it was easy to learn and could benefit patient interactions. Despite overwhelmingly positive user experience reports, there were some concerns that the app could negatively affect patient interactions due to reductions in eye contact and ability to build rapport. Conclusion Using the “Fit between Individuals, Task, and Technology” framework to guide interpretation, overall results indicate acceptable user experience and usability for this provider-focused point-of-care mobile app for substance use screening and intervention as well as favorable potential for adoption by health care practitioners. Such mobile health technologies may help to address well-known challenges related to implementing substance use services in health care settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0039-1684002

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a few technology products for substance use care with provider-facing aspects have undergone usability testing.

    “Despite their promise, only a few technology products for substance use care with provider-facing aspects have undergone usability testing (Levesque et al., 2018; O’Grady et al., 2019; Satre et al., 2017).”
  • Providers in Mozambique shared concerns about maintaining rapport and about the importance of introducing the app to patients that were similar to those in the original mSBIRT study conducted in the US.

    “While we found that providers in Mozambique shared similar concerns about maintaining rapport and the importance of introducing the app to patients as in the original mSBIRT study conducted in the US (O’Grady et al., 2019), they often mentioned patients’ satisfaction with the tablet and app.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sauro J, Zarolia P. SUPR-Qm: a questionnaire to measure the mobile app user experience. J Usability Stud 2017;13(01):17-37

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Grady, M., Kapoor, S., Gilmer, E., Neighbors, C., Conigliaro, J., Kwon, N., & Morgenstern, J.
Affiliations
  • Health Services Research, Center on Addiction, New York, New York, United States
  • Northwell Health (US)
Venue
ACI Open
Published
2019-01
Volume
03
Issue
01
Pages
e1-e12
ISSN
2566-9346 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2922911935
Cited by
6
References
50
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACI Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (5U79TI025102)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
substance use screening, substance use interventions, mobile health, health coaches, user experience, usability, emergency department, primary care, provider barriers, patient rapport, technology adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review