Cited by 7Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Stage-Based Mobile Intervention for Substance Use Disorders in Primary Care: Development and Test of Acceptability

Open access
Levesque, Deborah, Umanzor, Cindy, de Aguiar, Emma·2018·JMIR Medical Informatics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2016, 21 million Americans aged 12 years and older needed treatment for a substance use disorder (SUD). However, only 10% to 11% of individuals requiring SUD treatment received it. Given their access to patients, primary care providers are in a unique position to perform universal Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) to identify individuals at risk, fill gaps in services, and make referrals to specialty treatment when indicated. Major barriers to SBIRT include limited time among providers and low motivation to change among many patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop and test the acceptability of a prototype of a mobile-delivered substance use risk intervention (SURI) for primary care patients and a clinical dashboard for providers that can address major barriers to SBIRT for risky drug use. The SURI delivers screening and feedback on SUD risk via mobile tools to patients at home or in the waiting room; for patients at risk, it also delivers a brief intervention based on the transtheoretical model of behavior change (TTM) to facilitate progress through the stages of change for quitting the most problematic drug and for seeking treatment if indicated. The prototype also delivers 30 days of stage-matched text messages and 4 Web-based activities addressing key topics. For providers, the clinical dashboard summarizes the patient's SUD risk scores and stage of change data, and provides stage-matched scripts to guide in-person sessions. METHODS: A total of 4 providers from 2 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) were recruited for the pilot test, and they in turn recruited 5 patients with a known SUD. Furthermore, 3 providers delivered dashboard-guided SBIRT sessions and completed a brief acceptability survey. A total of 4 patients completed a Web-based SURI session and in-person SBIRT session, accessed other program components, and completed 3 acceptability surveys over 30 days. Questions in the surveys were adapted from the National Cancer Institute's Education Materials Review Form. Response options ranged from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. The criterion for establishing acceptability was an overall rating of 4.0 or higher across items. RESULTS: For providers, the overall mean acceptability rating was 4.4 (standard deviation [SD] 0.4). Notably, all providers gave a rating of 5.0 for the item, "The program can give me helpful information about my patient." For patients, the overall mean acceptability rating was 4.5 (SD 0.3) for the mobile- and provider-delivered SBIRT sessions and 4.0 (SD 0.4) for the text messages and Web-based activities. One highly rated item was "The program could help me make some positive changes" (4.5). CONCLUSIONS: The SURI program and clinical dashboard, developed to reduce barriers to SBIRT in primary care, were well received by providers and patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/medinform.7355

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a few technology products for substance use care with provider-facing aspects have undergone usability testing.

    “Despite their promise, only a few technology products for substance use care with provider-facing aspects have undergone usability testing (Levesque et al., 2018; O’Grady et al., 2019; Satre et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [25]Prochaska J DiClemente C The transtheoretical approach: Crossing traditional boundaries of change 1984 Homewood, IL Dorsey Press
  2. [26]Prochaska J DiClemente C Shiffman S Wills T Common processes of self-change in smoking, weight control, and psychological distress Coping and substance abuse: A conceptual framework 1985 New York Academic Press 345 363

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levesque, D., Umanzor, C., & de Aguiar, E.
Affiliations
Pro Change Behavior Systems (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Levesque, Deborah
Venue
JMIR Medical Informatics
Published
2018-01-02
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
e1
ISSN
2291-9694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2781980174
Cited by
7
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Medical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
substance use disorders, SBIRT, mobile health intervention, brief intervention, stages of change, transtheoretical model, clinical dashboards, provider acceptability, patient acceptability, text messaging, online intervention, primary care, federally qualified health centers, referral to treatment, substance use prevention, barriers to treatment seeking, program development, prototype testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review