Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta.

Prince, M R, Narasimham, D L, Jacoby, W T, Williams, D M, Cho, K J, Marx, M V, Deeb, G M·1996·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate image quality and preliminary clinical experience with three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety patients with suspected thoracic aorta pathology underwent 97 MR examinations at 1.5 T with a 4-min, three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo techniques. Gadolinium infusion was timed for maximum arterial contrast during acquisition of the central portion of K-space. No ECG gating or breath-holding was used. All MR examinations were evaluated retrospectively for intravascular signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In 30 of the 90 patients, results from surgery (n = 11), angiography (n = 12), or both (n = 7) were available. Four radiologists who were unaware of the angiographic or surgical findings assessed each of these 30 examinations for three types of pathology: dissection, coarctation, or aneurysm. The observers also assessed aortic branch vessel patency and vascular anomalies in the 19 patients who had angiographic correlation. RESULTS: Image quality (determined as SNR) was highest in the aortic arch, upper descending thoracic aorta, and upper abdominal aorta. We saw a small reduction in the SNR in the ascending aorta and lower descending thoracic aorta (p < .0001), attributable to cardiac and respiratory motion. Image quality was not affected by slow flow. MR imaging correctly diagnosed pathology in all 30 patients with angiographic or surgical correlation, including eight dissections, three coarctations, and 10 aneurysms. The type of the dissection was correctly determined in all eight patients. Stenoses of major branch vessel origins were detected with a sensitivity of 90% (95% bayesian confidence interval, 99-63%) and a specificity of 96% (95% bayesian confidence interval, 99-89%) in the 19 patients with angiographic correlation. Five vascular anomalies, including an aberrant right subclavian artery, a bovine arch, and three accessory renal arteries, were correctly identified. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography has the potential to accurately diagnose aortic dissection, coarctation, and aneurysm. It does not require ECG gating or breath-holding and thereby extends the diagnostic utility of MR imaging for the thoracic aorta.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.166.6.8633452

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Prince, M. R., Narasimham, D. L., Jacoby, W. T., Williams, D. M., Cho, K. J., Marx, M. V., & Deeb, G. M.
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
1996-06
Volume
166
Issue
6
Pages
1387-1397
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W2035652758
Cited by
296
References
8
FWCI
25.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.166.6.8633452
The paper
Prince, M. R., Narasimham, D. L., Jacoby, W. T., Williams, D. M., Cho, K. J., Marx, M. V., & Deeb, G. M. (1996). Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.166.6.8633452

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.