The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coronary Artery Calcium Measurement: Agreement of Multirow Detector and Electron Beam CT
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to establish the most suitable algorithm to compare coronary artery calcium measurements performed with electron beam CT and multirow detector CT for the assessment of coronary artery disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Coronary artery screening was performed in 100 patients with both electron beam and multirow detector CT. The images were transferred to a dedicated workstation for determination of the calcium score, volume, mass, density, and number of lesions. In addition to the traditional threshold of 130 H, the score of multirow detector CT studies was reevaluated at a threshold of 90 H. Fifty-nine of the patients underwent conventional coronary catheterization. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the different scoring algorithms for detection of significant coronary artery stenosis was performed. RESULTS: The correlation between electron beam CT and multirow detector CT was high for every quantification algorithm. Determination of the score and the number of lesions with multirow detector CT revealed a systematic error of the measurement compared with electron beam CT. The areas under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for electron beam and multirow detector CT were similar for the score, volume, and mass, whereas they were lower for the density. No significant difference was found for the areas under the curve between scores using a 130-H and those using a 90-H threshold. CONCLUSION: Volume and mass indexes are superior to the traditional score, density, and number of lesions for comparing the results of electron beam and multirow detector CT and for determining significant coronary artery disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography
Agatston, A. S., Janowitz, W. R., Hildner, F. J., Zusmer, N. R., Viamonte, M., & Detrano, R. (1990) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t · Cited by 7,786
Cited by
Jakobs, T. F., Becker, C. R., Ohnesorge, B., Flohr, T., Suess, C., Schoepf, U. J., & Reiser, M. F. (2002) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-001-1278-x · Cited by 615
Self-citationAchenbach, S., Ropers, D., Pohle, K., Leber, A., Thilo, C., Knez, A., Menendez, T., Maeffert, R., Kusus, M., Regenfus, M., et al. (2002) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000027567.49283.ff · Cited by 339
Self-citationFayad, Z. A., Fuster, V., Nikolaou, K., & Becker, C. (2002) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000034392.34211.fc · Cited by 276
Self-citationCleary, P. A., Orchard, T. J., Genuth, S., Wong, N. D., Detrano, R., Backlund, J.-Y. C., Zinman, B., Jacobson, A., Sun, W., Lachin, J. M., et al. (2006) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db06-0653 · Cited by 264
da Luz, P. L., Bertini, P. J., & Favarato, D. (2005) · Clinics · doi:10.1590/s1807-59322005000500011 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker, C. R., Kleffel, T., Crispin, A., Knez, A., Young, J., Schoepf, U. J., Haberl, R., & Reiser, M. F.
- Venue
- American Journal of Roentgenology
- Publisher
- American Roentgen Ray Society
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1295-1298
- ISSN
- 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 0361-803X
- 1546-3141
- OpenAlex
- W2102742963
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coronary Artery Calcium Measurement: Agreement of Multirow Detector and Electron Beam CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.176.5.1761295
- The paper
- Becker, C. R., Kleffel, T., Crispin, A., Knez, A., Young, J., Schoepf, U. J., Haberl, R., & Reiser, M. F. (2001). Coronary Artery Calcium Measurement: Agreement of Multirow Detector and Electron Beam CT. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.5.1761295
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.