Cited by 35Epigenetics and DNA MethylationBirth, Development, and HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Leukocyte Methylomic Imprints of Exposure to the Genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda: a Pilot Epigenome-Wide Analysis

Open access
Musanabaganwa, Clarisse, Wani, Agaz H, Donglasan, Janelle, Fatumo, Segun, Jansen, Stefan, Mutabaruka, Jean, Rutembesa, Eugene, Uwineza, Annette +5 more·2022·Epigenomics

Abstract

Aim & methods: We conducted a pilot epigenome-wide association study of women from Tutsi ethnicity exposed to the genocide while pregnant and their resulting offspring, and a comparison group of women who were pregnant at the time of the genocide but living outside of Rwanda.Results: Fifty-nine leukocyte-derived DNA samples survived quality control: 33 mothers (20 exposed, 13 unexposed) and 26 offspring (16 exposed, 10 unexposed). Twenty-four significant differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified in mothers and 16 in children. Conclusions: In utero genocide exposure was associated with CpGs in three of the 24 DMRs: BCOR, PRDM8 and VWDE, with higher DNA methylation in exposed versus unexposed offspring. Of note, BCOR and VWDE show significant correlation between brain and blood DNA methylation within individuals, suggesting these peripherally derived signals of genocide exposure may have relevance to the brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/epi-2021-0310

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Musanabaganwa, C., Wani, A. H., Donglasan, J., Fatumo, S., Jansen, S., Mutabaruka, J., Rutembesa, E., Uwineza, A., Hermans, E. J., Roozendaal, B., Wildman, D. E., Mutesa, L., & Uddin, M.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of Rwanda (RW)
  • Department of Clinical Psychology, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Huye, Rwanda
  • Centre for Human Genetics, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
Venue
Epigenomics
Published
2021-12-08
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
11-25
ISSN
  • 1750-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-192X
OpenAlex
W4200381659
Cited by
35
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epigenomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Healt (U01MH115485)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
Tutsi, prenatal exposure, DNA methylation, differentially methylated regions, BCOR, PRDM8, leukocyte DNA, Rwandan genocide
MeSH terms
Epigenome, Child, Female, Humans, Leukocytes, Pregnancy, Rwanda, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Survivors, DNA Methylation, Genocide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review