Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quality Control Guidelines for Clinical-Grade Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines

Open access
Sullivan, Stephen, Stacey, Glyn N, Akazawa, Chihiro, Aoyama, Naoki, Baptista, Ricardo, Bedford, Patrick, Bennaceur Griscelli, Annelise, Chandra, Amit, Elwood, Ngaire, Girard, Mathilde, Kawamata, Shin, Hanatani, Tadaaki, Latsis, Theodoros, Lin, Stephen, Ludwig, Tenneille E, Malygina, Tamara, Mack, Amanda, Mountford, Joanne C, Noggle, Scott, Pereira, Lygia V, Price, Jack, Sheldon, Michael, Srivastava, Alok, Stachelscheid, Harald, Velayudhan, Shaji R, Ward, Natalie J, Turner, Marc L, Barry, Jacqueline, Song, Jihwan·2018·Regenerative Medicine

Abstract

Use of clinical-grade human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines as a starting material for the generation of cellular therapeutics requires demonstration of comparability of lines derived from different individuals and in different facilities. This requires agreement on the critical quality attributes of such lines and the assays that should be used. Working from established recommendations and guidance from the International Stem Cell Banking Initiative for human embryonic stem cell banking, and concentrating on those issues more relevant to iPSCs, a series of consensus workshops has made initial recommendations on the minimum dataset required to consider an iPSC line of clinical grade, which are outlined in this report. Continued evolution of this field will likely lead to revision of these guidelines on a regular basis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/rme-2018-0095

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Sullivan, S., Stacey, G. N., Akazawa, C., Aoyama, N., Baptista, R., Bedford, P., Bennaceur Griscelli, A., Chandra, A., Elwood, N., Girard, M., Kawamata, S., Hanatani, T., Latsis, T., Lin, S., Ludwig, T. E., Malygina, T., Mack, A., Mountford, J. C., Noggle, S., Pereira, L. V., Price, J., Sheldon, M., Srivastava, A., Stachelscheid, H., Velayudhan, S. R., Ward, N. J., Turner, M. L., Barry, J., & Song, J.
Venue
Regenerative Medicine
Published
2018-09-12
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
859-866
ISSN
  • 1746-0751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-076X
OpenAlex
W2890443759
Cited by
265
References
24
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality Control Guidelines for Clinical-Grade Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2217/rme-2018-0095
The paper
Sullivan, S., Stacey, G. N., Akazawa, C., Aoyama, N., Baptista, R., Bedford, P., Bennaceur Griscelli, A., Chandra, A., Elwood, N., Girard, M., Kawamata, S., Hanatani, T., Latsis, T., Lin, S., Ludwig, T. E., Malygina, T., Mack, A., Mountford, J. C., Noggle, S., . . . Song, J. (2018). Quality Control Guidelines for Clinical-Grade Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines. Regenerative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2018-0095

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.