CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 57

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Examining the LLAMA aptitude tests

Rogers, Vivienne, Meara, Paul, Barnett-Legh, Thomas, Curry, Clare, Davie, Emma·2017·Journal of the European Second Language Association
DOI 10.22599/jesla.24
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22599/jesla.24

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Five of the pictures used in LLAMA_B.
Figure 1 Five of the pictures used in LLAMA_B.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 The syllabary used in LLAMA_E.
Figure 2 The syllabary used in LLAMA_E.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 An example of the stimuli used in the presentation phase. The pictures are designed to highlight key grammatical features.
Figure 3 An example of the stimuli used in the presentation phase. The pictures are designed to highlight key grammatical features.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Abrahamsson, 2008, The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 481, 10.1017/S027226310808073X · DOI · Paper page
  2. Akamatsu, 1999, The effects of first language orthographic features on word recognition processing in English as a second language, Reading and Writing, 11, 381, 10.1023/A:1008053520326 · DOI
  3. Bialystok, 2005, Bilingualism, biliteracy, and learning to read: Interactions among languages and writing systems, Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 43, 10.1207/s1532799xssr0901_4 · DOI
  4. Bley-Vroman, 1989, What is the logical problem of foreign language learning?, Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition, 4, 1
  5. Carroll, 1973, Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign-language teaching, Linguistics, 11, 5, 10.1515/ling.1973.11.112.5 · DOI
  6. Carroll, 1981, Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude, 83
  7. Carroll, 1990, Language Aptitude Reconsidered, 11
  8. Carroll, 1959, Modern Language Aptitude Test
  9. Crystal, 1987, The Encyclopedia of Language
  10. De Graaff, 1997, The eXperanto experiment, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249, 10.1017/S0272263197002064 · DOI
  11. DeKeyser, 2000, The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499, 10.1017/S0272263100004022 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dörnyei, 2003, The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 589, 10.1002/9780470756492.ch18 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gholamain, 1999, Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in English and Persian, Language Learning, 49, 183, 10.1111/0023-8333.00087 · DOI
  14. Granena, 2013, Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment, 105, 10.1075/lllt.35.04gra · DOI
  15. Granena, 2016, Explicit and implicit cognitive aptitudes and information-processing styles: An individual differences study, Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 577, 10.1017/S0142716415000120 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Green, 1987, The effects of script on visual search, Second Language Research, 3, 102
  17. Grigorenko, 2000, A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The canal-F theory and test, The Modern Language Journal, 84, 390, 10.1111/0026-7902.00076 · DOI
  18. Hamada, 2008, Influence of first language orthographic experience on second language decoding and word learning, Language Learning, 58, 1, 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00433.x · DOI
  19. Hulstijn, 2005, Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning: Introduction, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 129, 10.1017/S0272263105050084 · DOI
  20. Kaushanskaya, 2009, The bilingual advantage in novel word learning, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 705, 10.3758/PBR.16.4.705 · DOI
  21. Kormos, 2013, Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude and Ultimate Attainment, 131, 10.1075/lllt.35.05kor · DOI · Paper page
  22. Li, 2016, The construct validity of language aptitude, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 801, 10.1017/S027226311500042X · DOI
  23. Linck, 2013, Hi-lab: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency, Language Learning, 63, 530, 10.1111/lang.12011 · DOI
  24. McLaughlin, 1990, The Development of Second Language Proficiency, 158, 10.1017/CBO9781139524568.014 · DOI
  25. Meara, 2005, LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests: The Manual
  26. Milton, 2009, Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition, 10.21832/9781847692092 · DOI
  27. Miralpeix, 2006, Age and the Rate of Foreign Language Learning, 89, 10.21832/9781853598937-006 · DOI
  28. Miralpeix, 2009, Lexical knowledge in instructed language learning: The effects of age and exposure, International Journal of English Studies, 7, 61
  29. Muñoz, 2014, Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism, 51, 10.1007/978-3-319-01414-2_4 · DOI
  30. Nayak, 1990, Language-learning strategies in monolingual and multilingual adults, Language Learning, 40, 221, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb01334.x · DOI
  31. Neufeld, 1978, A theoretical perspective on the nature of linguistic aptitude, IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 16, 15, 10.1515/iral.1978.16.1-4.15 · DOI
  32. Patkowski, 1980, The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language, Language Learning, 30, 449, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00328.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. Petersen, 1976, The development of the defense language aptitude battery (DLAB), Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 369, 10.1177/001316447603600216 · DOI
  34. Pimsleur, 1966, Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (Forms)
  35. Rogers, 2016, Paper presented at Psychology of Language Learning 2
  36. Rogers, 2017, How Does Aptitude Relate to Working Memory?
  37. Rogers, 2016, Testing aptitude, EUROSLA Yearbook, 16, 179, 10.1075/eurosla.16.07rog · DOI
  38. Safar, 2008, Revisiting problems with foreign language aptitude, IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46, 113, 10.1515/IRAL.2008.005 · DOI
  39. Sampson, 1985, Writing Systems: A Linguistic Introduction
  40. Sasaki, 1999, Second Language Proficiency, Foreign Language Aptitude, and Intelligence
  41. Sawyer, 1992, Language aptitude and language experience: Are they related?, Working Papers, 3, 27
  42. Skehan, 2016, Cognitive Individual Differences in L2 Processing and Acquisition
  43. Sparks, 1995, An exploratory study on the effects of Latin on the native language skills and foreign language aptitude of students with and without learning disabilities, The Classical Journal, 91, 165
  44. Sparks, 2013, Relationship of L1 skills and L2 aptitude to L2 anxiety on the foreign language classroom anxiety scale, Language Learning, 63, 870, 10.1111/lang.12025 · DOI
  45. Sternberg, 2002, Dynamic Testing: The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential
  46. Tan, 2003, Neural systems of second language reading are shaped by native language, Human Brain Mapping, 18, 158, 10.1002/hbm.10089 · DOI
  47. Thompson, 2013, The interface of language aptitude and multilingualism: Reconsidering the bilingual/multilingual dichotomy, The Modern Language Journal, 97, 685, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12034.x · DOI
  48. Tolchinsky, 2012, Building literacy in alphabetic, abjad and morphosyllabic systems, Reading and Writing, 25, 1573, 10.1007/s11145-011-9334-7 · DOI
  49. Wen, 2016, Working Memory and Second Language Learning: Towards an Integrated Approach, 10.21832/9781783095735 · DOI
  50. Wesche, 1981, Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude, 119

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 57

Metadata

Authors
Rogers, V., Meara, P., Barnett-Legh, T., Curry, C., & Davie, E.
ORCID
Rogers, Vivienne
Venue
Journal of the European Second Language Association
Publisher
White Rose University Press
Published
2017-08-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
49-60
ISSN
2399-9101
DOI
10.22599/jesla.24
Cited by
57
References
3
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review