The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developmental Aspects of Cross-Language Speech Perception
Abstract
Previous research has suggested that infants discriminate many speech sounds according to phonemic category regardless of language exposure, while adults of one language group may have difficulty discriminating nonnative linguistic contrasts. Our study attempted to address directly questions about infant perceptual ability and the possibility of its decline as a function of development in the absence of specific experience by comparing English-speaking adults, Hindi-speaking adults, and 7-month-old infants on their ability to discriminate 2 pairs of natural Hindi (non-English) speech contrasts. To do this, infants were tested in a "visually reinforced infant speech discrimination" paradigm, while a variant of this paradigm was used to test adults. Support was obtained for the above hypotheses. Infants were shown to be able to discriminate both Hindi sound pairs, and support for the idea of a decrease in speech perceptual abilities wih age and experience was clearly evident with the rarer of the 2 non-English contrasts. The results were then discussed with respect to the possible nature and purpose of these abilities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, research shows that infants tested at 10 to 12 months of age fail to detect the difference between two foreign-language sounds that they could discriminate earlier in life (Werker, Gilbert, Humphrey, & Tees, 1981).”
From Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not (1991) · cites this paper as Werker, Gilbert, Humphrey, & Tees, 1981
In the citing paper
“Effects of linguistic experience have previously been reported in 12month-old infants (Werker et al., 1981; Werker & Tees, 1984);”
From Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not (1991) · cites this paper as Werker et al., 1981
In the citing paper
“Initial results suggested that Englishlearning infants aged 6-8 months can discriminate these non-English distinctions as well as native Hindi and Thompson speakers, but that English-speaking adults (Werker, Gilbert, Humphrey, & Tees, 1981) and Englishlearning infants aged 10-12 months (Werker & Tees, 1984a) cannot.”
From Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception (1985) · cites this paper as Werker, Gilbert, Humphrey, & Tees, 1981
In the citing paper
“Initial results suggested that Englishlearning infants aged 6-8 months can discriminate these non-English distinctions as well as native Hindi and Thompson speakers, but that English-speaking adults (Werker, Gilbert, Humphrey, & Tees, 1981) and Englishlearning infants aged 10-12 months (Werker & Tees, 1984a) cannot.”
From Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception (1985) · cites this paper as Werker, Gilbert, Humphrey, & Tees, 1981
Citations
Cites
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P., & Vigorito, J. (1971) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.171.3968.303 · Cited by 2,154
Hill, K. C. (1977) · Language · doi:10.2307/412918 · Cited by 1,769
Miyawaki, K., Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., Liberman, A. M., Verbrugge, R., & Fujimura, O. (1975) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211209 · Cited by 689
Language perception of 2-month-old infants shows effects of both innate mechanisms and experience
STREETER, L. A. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/259039a0 · Cited by 379
The Discrimination of Foreign Speech Contrasts by Infants and Adults
Trehub, S. E. (1976) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1128803 · Cited by 347
Large-sample multiple comparisons.
Marascuilo, L. A. (1966) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0023189 · Cited by 337
Eimas, P. D. (1975) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211210 · Cited by 295
VOT discrimination by four to six and a half month old infants from Spanish environments
Lasky, R. E., Syrdal-Lasky, A., & Klein, R. E. (1975) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-0965(75)90099-5 · Cited by 289
Speech Perception in Early Infancy
Eimas, P. D. (1975) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-178602-1.50012-9 · Cited by 248
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80022-3 · Cited by 2,801
“Another Experimenter (El) sat outside the chamber observing the infant through a one-way observation window and monitored the logic system console (for details, see Werker et al., 1981).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationDevelopment of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition
Blakemore, S., & Choudhury, S. (2006) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01611.x · Cited by 2,328
“Before about 12 months of age babies brought up in the USA can detect the difference between certain sounds common in the Hindi language, which after 12 months they cannot distinguish ( Werker, Gilbert, Humphrey, & Tees, 1981 ).”
BackgroundThe social brain in adolescence
Blakemore, S.-J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2353 · Cited by 1,896
“For example, before approximately 12 months of age, babies that have been brought up in the United States can detect the difference between certain sounds that are common in the Hindi language; after 12 months they can no longer distinguish these sounds because the English language does not contain the”
Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination
Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00157-3 · Cited by 1,364
Self-citationAdolescent suicide and suicidal behavior
Bridge, J. A., Goldstein, T. R., & Brent, D. A. (2006) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01615.x · Cited by 1,361
Metadata
- Authors
- Werker, J. F., Gilbert, J. H. V., Humphrey, K., & Tees, R. C.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1981-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 349
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037751943
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- cross-language speech perception, phonemic categories, perceptual narrowing, language experience, English-speaking adults
- MeSH terms
- Child Development, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Infant, Language, Male, Phonetics, Speech Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review