Cited by 295Phonetics and Phonology ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersNeuroscience and Music Perception

Auditory and phonetic coding of the cues for speech: discrimination of the /r–l/ distinction by young infants

Open access
Eimas, Peter D.·1975·Perception & Psychophysics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03211210

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infants initially hear all phonetic differences.

    “An important discovery in the 1970s was that infants initially hear all these phonetic differences (Eimas, 1975; Eimas et al., 1971; Lasky et al., 1975; Werker and Lalonde, 1988).”

    From Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition (2010) · cites this paper as Eimas, 1975

    The paper reports that 2- and 3-month-old infants discriminate the /r–l/ contrast, and its Discussion proposes early sensitivity to “most, if not all” phonetic distinctions. That supports broad early sensitivity, but the paper does not establish as fact that infants initially hear all phonetic differences. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Infants discriminate only between stimuli from different phonetic categories.

    “Infants discriminated only between stimuli from different phonetic categories (12–14).”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [14]

  • The initial perceptual biases shown by infants in tests of categorical perception, as well as asymmetries in perception seen in infancy, produce a contouring of the perceptual space that is universal.

    “The important point regarding development is that the initial perceptual biases shown by infants in tests of categorical perception (12–16), as well as asymmetries in perception seen in infancy (80, 81), produce a contouring of the perceptual space that is universal.”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [14]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [1]1. ABRAMSON. A. S.. & LISKER, L. Discriminability along the voicing continuum: Cross-language tests. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress ofPhonetic Sciences, Prague, 1967. Prague: Academic. 1970. Pp. 569-573.
  2. [6]6. EIMAS. P. D. Developmental aspects of speech perception. In R. Held, H. Leibowitz, & H. L. Teuber (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology: Perception. New York: Springer-Verlag, in press. (
  3. [17]17. LiSKEl<. L., & ABRAMSON. A. S. The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Prague. 1967. Prague: Academia, 1970. Pp, 563-567.
  4. [19]19. MILLER, J. L. Phonetic determinants of infant speech perception. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Minnesota, 1974.
  5. [24]24. STEVENS. K. N.• LIBERMAN, A. M .• STUDDERT-KENNEDY. M .• & OHMAN. S. E. G. Cross-language study of vowel perception. Language and Speech. 1969, 12, 1-23.
  6. [25]25. STREETER. L. A. The effects of linguistic experience on phonetic Perception. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Columbia University. 1974.
  7. [28]28. WILLIAMS, L. Speech perception and production as a function ofexposure to a second language. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Harvard University. 1974.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eimas, P. D.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Eimas, Peter D.
Venue
Perception & Psychophysics
Published
1975-09
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
341-347
ISSN
  • 0031-5117 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5962
OpenAlex
W2075371579
Cited by
295
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
infant speech perception, phonetic discrimination, auditory coding, phonetic categories, acoustic cues, categorical perception, familiarization, language experience, speech perception development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review