The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Text and Cultural Politics
Abstract
The school curriculum is not neutral knowledge. Rather, what counts as legitimate knowledge is the result of complex power relations, struggles, and compromises among identifiable class, race, gender, and religious groups. A good deal of conceptual and empirical progress has been made in the last 2 decades in answering the question of whose knowledge becomes socially legitimate in schools. Yet, little attention has actually been paid to that one arti-fact that plays such a major role in defining whose culture is taught–the textbook. In this article, I discuss ways of approaching texts as embodiments of a larger process of cultural politics. Analyses of them must focus on the complex power relationships involved in their production, contexts, use, and reading. I caution us against employing overly reductive kinds of perspectives and point to the importance of newer forms of textual analysis that stress the politics of how students actually create meanings around texts. Finally, I point to some of the implications of all this for our discussions of curriculum policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Williams, R. (1961) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/will93760 · Cited by 3,220
Rational Decision-Making in Business OrganizationsPreprint
Simon, H. A. (1979) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 2,870
Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy
Ellsworth, E. (1989) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.59.3.058342114k266250 · Cited by 2,759
Whitty, G., & Apple, M. W. (1982) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121566 · Cited by 2,198
Self-citationMarxism and the Interpretation of Culture
(1400) · Macmillan Education UK-London eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1 · Cited by 2,085
Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems.
Beyer, J. M., & Scott, W. R. (1984) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393090 · Cited by 1,789
The Closing of the American Mind
Bloom, A. (2021) · Campus Wars · doi:10.4324/9780429038556-3 · Cited by 1,609
Apple, M. W. (1990) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203241219 · Cited by 1,536
Self-citationRacial Formation in the United States
Omi, M., & Winant, H. (2018) · Inequality in the 21st Century · doi:10.4324/9780429499821-49 · Cited by 1,100
Racial Formation in the United States
Omi, M., & Winant, H. (2018) · The Inequality Reader · doi:10.4324/9780429494468-24 · Cited by 865
Cited by
Materials development for language learning and teaching
Tomlinson, B. (2012) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444811000528 · Cited by 811
Gender Voices in Hong Kong English Textbooks—Some Past and Current Practices
Lee, J. F. K., & Collins, P. (2008) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9414-6 · Cited by 188
Wynter-Hoyte, K., Braden, E. G., Rodriguez, S., & Thornton, N. (2019) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2017.1382465 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Apple, M. W.
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998237556
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 43.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Text and Cultural Politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1176356
- The paper
- Apple, M. W. (1992). The Text and Cultural Politics. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.