Cited by 237Cinema History and CriticismVisual Culture and Art TheoryCinema and Media Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 29 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

True Lies: Perceptual Realism, Digital Images, and Film Theory

Open access
Prince, Stephen·1996·Film Quarterly

Abstract

Research Article| April 01 1996 True Lies: Perceptual Realism, Digital Images, and Film Theory Stephen Prince Stephen Prince Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Film Quarterly (1996) 49 (3): 27–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1213468 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Stephen Prince; True Lies: Perceptual Realism, Digital Images, and Film Theory. Film Quarterly 1 April 1996; 49 (3): 27–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1213468 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentFilm Quarterly Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1995 The Regents of the University of California Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1213468

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 29 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 51 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 31
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 26
47 of 47
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No one has seen a living dinosaur, and paleontologists can only hazard guesses about how such creatures might have moved and how swiftly.

    “No one has seen a living dinosaur.Even paleontologists can only hazard guesses about how such creatures might have moved and how swiftly.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Historical and archival filmic records of reality exist and provide a referential standard against which a digital image can be judged falsified.

    “But these correspondences also establish a falsified relationship with the historical and archival filmic records of reality.”
2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Wollen, 1976, Signs and Meanings in the Cinema, 123
  2. Cavell, 1979, The World Viewed, 16
  3. Baker, 1994, How Did They Do It? Computer Illusion in Film and TV
  4. Magid, 1993, American Cinematographer, 74, 56
  5. Pizello, 1994, American Cinematographer, 75, 44
  6. Magid, 1994, American Cinematographer, 75, 52
  7. Baudry, 1986, Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology, 287
  8. McCabe, Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology, 182
  9. Andrew, 1984, Concepts in Film Theory, 25
  10. Philosophical Problems of Classical Film Theory, 255
  11. Nichols, Representing Reality, 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 235

Metadata

Authors
Prince, S.
Corresponding author
Prince, Stephen
Venue
Film Quarterly
Published
1996
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
27-37
ISSN
0015-1386 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4237058614
Cited by
237
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Film Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema History and Criticism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Visual Culture and Art Theory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema and Media Studies
Keywords
perceptual realism, digital images, film theory, digital cinema, image perception, film aesthetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review