Cited by 23Philosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceEmotions and Moral Behavior

Are Emotions Teleological Constructs?

Dunlap, Knight·1932·The American Journal of Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1415359

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some of the earliest investigations described emotional experience as comprising two dimensions, valence and intensity.

    “Some of the earliest investigations have described emotional experience as comprising two dimensionsvalence and intensity (e.g., Duffy, 1934Duffy, , 1941;;Dunlap, 1932).”

    From Emotional Intensity Predicts Autobiographical Memory Experience (2004) · cites this paper as Dunlap, 1932

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunlap, K.
Corresponding author
Dunlap, Knight
Venue
The American Journal of Psychology
Published
1932-07
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
572
ISSN
0002-9556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2329439302
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
50.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The American Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
emotions, teleology, evolutionary psychology, functions of emotions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review