Cited by 153Employment and Welfare StudiesLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityOrganizational Downsizing and Restructuring

A Panel Study of Coping with Involuntary Job Loss

Kinicki, A. J., Prussia, G. E., Mckee-Ryan, F. M.·2000·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

We examined the role of the quality of reemployment in the process of coping with job loss using a panel design and a four‐month interval for 100 displaced workers. The dynamic process of coping wi...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1556388

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kinicki, A. J., Prussia, G. E., & Mckee-Ryan, F. M.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2000-02-01
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
90-100
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2328505794
Cited by
153
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
12.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring
Keywords
involuntary job loss, coping, reemployment, displaced workers, unemployment, job search, panel survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review