Cited by 451Crime Patterns and InterventionsEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentYouth Development and Social Support

Long-Term Effects of Early Childhood Programs on Social Outcomes and Delinquency

Yoshikawa, Hirokazu·1995·The Future of Children

Abstract

The search for ways to prevent juvenile crime in the United States has become a matter of national urgency, as the incidence of serious offenses continues to rise. Most prevention initiatives focus on late childhood or adolescence. Such initiatives may be missing an important additional opportunity to intervene earlier in children's lives. This review of literature from criminology, psychology, and education shows that there exist key early childhood factors which are associated with later antisocial or delinquent behavior and that early childhood programs which seek to ameliorate the effects of those factors can prevent later antisocial or delinquent behavior. In particular, the review focuses on programs which have demonstrated long-term effects on antisocial behavior or delinquency. These programs have in common a combination of intensive family support and early education services, and effects on a broad range of child and family risk factors for delinquency. Moreover, there is promising evidence of their cost-effectiveness. As one element in a comprehensive plan to address poverty and other environmental causes of crime, programs combining family support with early education show promise in lessening the current devastating impact of delinquency on America's children and families.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1602367

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multimodal preventing programs combining preschool intervention and family support have been associated with the most enduring beneficial effects on social outcomes, including better overall academic performances and lower delinquency and antisocial behavior rates.

    “multimodal preventing programs combining preschool intervention and family support have been associated to the most enduring beneficial effects on a number of social outcomes, including significant better overall academic performances and lower delinquency and antisocial behavior rates [49]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoshikawa, H.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Yoshikawa, Hirokazu
Venue
The Future of Children
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1995
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
51
ISSN
1054-8289 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972118613
Cited by
451
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 17
FWCI
44.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Future of Children (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
early childhood programs, juvenile delinquency, antisocial behavior, juvenile delinquency prevention, family support, early childhood education, long-term effects, cost-effectiveness, poverty and crime, social outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Crime, Family Therapy, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Infant, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Personality Development, Social Adjustment, United States, Early Intervention, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review