The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Formal Theory of the Employment Relationship
Abstract
A model was constructed that incorporates rational grounds for the choice by two individuals between an employment contract and a contract of the ordinary kind (which we have called a sales contract). By a generalization of this model one can account for the fact that in an employment contract certain aspects of the workers's behavior are stipulated in the contract terms, certain other aspects are placed within the authority of the employer, and still other aspects are left to the worker's choice. Since administrative theory was interested in explaining behavior within the framework of employment relations, and economic theory in explaining behavior within the area of market relations, the model suggests one possible way of relating these two bodies of theory. The most serious limitations of the model lie in the assumptions of rational utility-maximizing behavior incorporated in it. (Author)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multitask principal – agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design
Holmstrom, B., & Milgrom, P. (1991) · The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.24 · Cited by 6,046
Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure
Hart, O. (1995) · doi:10.1093/0198288816.001.0001 · Cited by 4,672
A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.477 · Cited by 3,146
The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions.
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875 · Cited by 2,224
A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective
Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0093 · Cited by 1,342
Complementary and Supplementary Fit: A Theoretical and Empirical Integration.
Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.822 · Cited by 949
Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments
Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2010 · Cited by 502
The Road Taken: Origins and Evolution of Employment Systems in Emerging Companies
BARON, J. N., BURTON, M. D., & HANNAN, M. T. (1996) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/5.2.239 · Cited by 287
Dube, A., & Kaplan, E. (2010) · ILR Review · doi:10.1177/001979391006300206 · Cited by 203
The Entrepreneurial Theory of the Firm and the Theory of the Entrepreneurial Firm*
Langlois, R. N. (2007) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00728.x · Cited by 199
Woods, P. A., & Gronn, P. (2009) · Educational Management Administration & Leadership · doi:10.1177/1741143209334597 · Cited by 128
Kaufman, B. E. (2010) · ILR Review · doi:10.1177/001979391006400104 · Cited by 122
(1992) · eCommons (Cornell University) · Cited by 44
Claudy, M. C., Aquino, K., & Graso, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.898027 · Cited by 34
Bernacchio, C., & Foss, N. (2024) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4736313 · Cited by 17
Home Bias in Online Employment
Liang, C., Hong, Y. (., & Gu, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.437 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Simon, H. A.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1951-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 293
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025475785
- Cited by
- 1,314
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.