The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Substitutability of Natives and Immigrants in Production
Abstract
T HE United States is a country of immigrants and sons and daughters of former immigrants. From colonial times to the 1920s, America had an open door immigration policy. Although the formal policy generally welcomed immigrants, those who preceded the newcomers have never looked kindly on the arrival of new immigrants. Xenophobia has been a common reaction by Americans to large scale inflows. Although ethnocentrism undoubtedly is one reason for such isolationist feelings, fear of economic displacement is another underlying cause.' At the center of the debates over immigration policy has been the fear that the newcomers take jobs away from native Americans. The substitutability of natives for immigrants is critical in evaluating the validity of the displacement fears. A number of theoretical contributions, including Gerking and Mutti (1979), Grossman (1981) and Johnson (1980a) have dealt with the economic effects of international labor inflows. However, no empirical investigation of these issues has been undertaken. The absence of such studies is due, at least in part, to the lack of accurate data on the number of employed illegal immigrants, who comprise a substantial portion of the immigrant stock. While it is currently not possible to develop empirical estimates of the substitutability of illegal immigrants and natives, or even between the most recent wave of legal immigrants and natives, it is nonetheless useful to investigate the relationship in production that has historically existed between immigrants and the domestic labor force. In what follows, I use cross-section data for 1970, the most recent year for which such data are available, to estimate aggregate production relationships. The resulting estimates shed light on the substitutability between the stock of immigrants in the United States at that time, and the native work force. Until more is known about the employment behavior of more recent illegal and legal (especially refugee) immigrants, this is the best that can be accomplished.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Immigrant Inflows, Native Outflows, and the Local Labor Market Impacts of Higher Immigration
Card, D. (2001) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/209979 · Cited by 1,772
Economic Theory and International Migration
Borjas, G. J. (1989) · International Migration Review · doi:10.1177/019791838902300304 · Cited by 836
Aydemir, A., & Borjas, G. J. (2007) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/jeea.2007.5.4.663 · Cited by 280
Working with Co-Ethnics: Earnings Penalties for Latino Immigrants at Latino Jobsites
Catanzarite, L., & Aguilera, M. B. (2002) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2002.49.1.101 · Cited by 96
Partition, Migration, and Jute Cultivation in India
Bharadwaj, P., & Fenske, J. (2012) · Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2011.579114 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Grossman, J. B.
- Venue
- The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982-11
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 596
- ISSN
- 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061793952
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Substitutability of Natives and Immigrants in Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1923944
- The paper
- Grossman, J. B. (1982). The Substitutability of Natives and Immigrants in Production. The Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1923944
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.