The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nutrient Dynamics in an Agricultural Watershed: Observations on the Role of A Riparian Forest
Abstract
Nutrient (C, N, and P) concentration changes were measured in surface runoff and shallow groundwater as they moved through a small agricultural (cropland) watershed located in Maryland. During the study period (March 1981 to March 1982), dramatic changes in water—borne nutrient loads occurred in the riparian forest of the watershed. From surface runoff waters that had transited °50 m of riparian forest, an estimated 4.1 Mg of particulates, 11 kg of particulate organic—N, 0.83 kg of ammonium—N, 2.7 kg of nitrate—N and 3.0 kg of total particulate—P per ha of riparian forest were removed during the study year. In addition, an estimated removal of 45 kg°ha—1°yr—1 of nitrate N occurred in subsurface flow as it moved through the riparian zone. Nutrient uptake rates for the cropland are riparian forest were estimated. These systems were then compared with respect to their pathways of nutrient flow and ability to retain nutrients. The cropland appeared to retain fewer nutrients than the riparian forest and is thought to incur the majority of its nutrient losses in harvested crop. The dominant pathway of total—N loss from the riparian forest seemed to be subsurface flux. Total phosphorus loss from the riparian forest appeared almost evenly divided between surface and subsurface losses. Nutrient removals in the riparian forest and thought to be of ecological significance to receiving waters and indicate that coupling natural systems and managed habitats within a watershed may reduce diffuse—source pollution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Ecology of Interfaces: Riparian Zones
Naiman, R. J., & Décamps, H. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621 · Cited by 2,791
An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian Zones
Gregory, S. V., Swanson, F. J., McKee, W. A., & Cummins, K. W. (1991) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1311607 · Cited by 2,460
Nitrogen Management Strategies to Reduce Nitrate Leaching in Tile‐Drained Midwestern Soils
Dinnes, D. L., Karlen, D. L., Jaynes, D. B., Kaspar, T. C., Hatfield, J. L., Colvin, T. S., & Cambardella, C. A. (2002) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2002.1530 · Cited by 1,010
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS OF LANDUSE ON WATER QUALITY IN A SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN WATERSHED1
Bolstad, P. V., & Swank, W. T. (1997) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb03529.x · Cited by 231
Nutrient uptake in streams draining agricultural catchments of the midwestern United States
BERNOT, M. J., TANK, J. L., ROYER, T. V., & DAVID, M. B. (2006) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01508.x · Cited by 220
Tufekcioglu, A., Raich, J. W., Isenhart, T. M., & Schultz, R. C. (2003) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1023/a:1024898615284 · Cited by 168
Regulators of denitrification in an organic riparian soil
Schipper, L. A., Cooper, A. B., Harfoot, C. G., & Dyck, W. J. (1993) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(93)90095-s · Cited by 143
Biggs, T. W., Dunne, T., & Martinelli, L. A. (2004) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/b:biog.0000025744.78309.2e · Cited by 113
Restoration and management of riparian ecosystems: a catchment perspective
Wissmar, R. C., & Beschta, R. L. (1998) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00383.x · Cited by 108
Gao, Z., Zhang, Q., Li, J., Wang, Y., Dzakpasu, M., & Wang, X. C. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117976 · Cited by 82
Landscape ecology and biogeography
Kupfer, J. A. (1995) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/030913339501900102 · Cited by 49
Upflow Reactors for Riparian Zone Denitrification
van Driel, P. W., Robertson, W. D., & Merkley, L. C. (2006) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0027 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Peterjohn, W. T., & Correll, D. L.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1466-1475
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2023102110
- Cited by
- 1,488
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.