The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands
Abstract
That many different officials contribute in many different ways to decisions and policies in the modern state makes it difficult to ascribe moral responsibility to any official. The usual responses to this problem—based on concepts of hierarchical and collective responsibility—distort the notion of responsibility. The idea of personal responsibility—based on causal and volitional criteria—constitutes a better approach to the problem of ascribing responsibility to public officials. Corresponding to each of these criteria are types of excuses that officials use in defending the decisions they make. An analysis of the conditions under which the excuses eliminate or mitigate responsibility provides a foundation for accountability in a democracy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As a matter of fact, other intelligent, autonomous entities with 'no soul to blame and no body to kick' (Asaro, 2012), such as, e.g. bureaucracies and corporates, may in themselves generate gaps in culpability.”
From Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and How to Address them (2021) · cites this paper as Thompson, 1980
In the citing paper
“In this way, the introduction of AI makes the 'problem of many hands' (Bovens, 1998; Thompson, 1980) more acute: data coming from different sources are introduced and enriched at different points in the data chain.”
From Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and How to Address them (2021) · cites this paper as Thompson, 1980
Citations
Cites
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person
Frankfurt, H. G. (1971) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2024717 · Cited by 4,663
(1970) · Cited by 3,618
Strawson, P. F. (1962) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 3,223
Edelman, M. J. (1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,047
Weldon, T. D., Kant, I., & Beck, L. W. (1949) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2182818 · Cited by 2,030
The Symbolic Uses of Politics.
Dawson, R. E., & Edelman, M. J. (1965) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109203 · Cited by 1,858
Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment
Hečlo, H. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,239
The New American Political System
Smith, G., & King, A. (1979) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20040234 · Cited by 1,175
Hart, H. L. A., & Gardner, J. B. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534777.001.0001 · Cited by 1,146
Utilitarianism: For and Against.
Ellis, A., Smart, J. J. C., Williams, B., & Quinton, A. M. (1974) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2217943 · Cited by 1,112
Bernstein, B. J., Allison, G., & ZELIKOW, P. D. (1999) · Foreign Policy · doi:10.2307/1149596 · Cited by 970
Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands
Walzer, M. (1974) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691238234-005 · Cited by 924
Walzer, M. (1977) · Cited by 828
Donagan, A. (1977) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226228419.001.0001 · Cited by 769
Smart, J. J. C., & Williams, B. (1973) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840852.002 · Cited by 712
Kissinger, H. A. (1979) · Cited by 616
Austin, J. L. (1971) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-15426-5_6 · Cited by 606
Fried, C. (1978) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674332508 · Cited by 575
I.—A Plea for Excuses: The Presidential Address
Austin, J. (1957) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) · doi:10.1093/aristotelian/57.1.1 · Cited by 546
Sabine, G. H., Gerth, H. H., & Mills, C. W. (1947) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2182065 · Cited by 499
Camillo, C. A. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_654 · Cited by 478
Hampshire, S. (1978) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625329.003 · Cited by 423
Pennock, J. R. (2015) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400868469 · Cited by 370
Gahringer, R. E. (1969) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2023994 · Cited by 370
Public administration: Concepts and cases
Stillman, R. J. (1976) · Cited by 313
Hampshire, S. (1978) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625329 · Cited by 252
Dworkin, G., & Feinberg, J. (1971) · Harvard Law Review · doi:10.2307/1339796 · Cited by 248
Are Bureaucracies Important? (Or Allison Wonderland)
Krasner, S. D. (1972) · Foreign Policy · doi:10.2307/1147761 · Cited by 240
Schlesinger, A. M. (1965) · Cited by 200
Morality and the Ideal of Rationality in Formal Organizations
Ladd, J. R. (1970) · The Monist · doi:10.5840/monist197054433 · Cited by 191
The Place of Principles in Policy Analysis
Anderson, C. W. (1979) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1955399 · Cited by 108
Bureaucratic Power in National Politics
Rourke, F. E. (1978) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 83
Edwards, J. (2006) · Cited by 74
Symbolic protest and calculated silence
Hill, T. E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609237.006 · Cited by 73
Guidelines for the Practice of Operations Research
(1971) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.19.5.1123 · Cited by 50
Donovan, R. J. (1977) · Cited by 34
The politics of the Federal bureaucracy
Altshuler, A. A. (1977) · Cited by 26
Ethical Dilemmas and the Education of Policymakers
Will, F. L. (1981) · Teaching Philosophy · doi:10.5840/teachphil19814241 · Cited by 25
Pride, Shame and Responsibility
Walsh, W. H. (1970) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2217909 · Cited by 23
Ethical Dilemmas and the Education of Policymakers
Honey, J. C., Fleishman, J. L., & Payne, B. L. (1982) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1982.11780468 · Cited by 19
Gross, L., & Rusk, D. (1977) · American Journal of International Law · doi:10.2307/2200341 · Cited by 19
Can investigations improve scientific advice? The case of the ABM
Doty, P. M. (1972) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/bf01682422 · Cited by 9
Morriss, R. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315248288-4 · Cited by 8
Individual and Collective Responsibility
Petersen, T. S. (2006) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781781007525.00024 · Cited by 4
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bok, 1978, Lying
- Lowi, 1979, The End of Liberalism
- Truman, 1955, Memoirs, Vol. 1, Years of Decisions
- 1971, In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer
- Rohr, 1978, Ethics for Bureaucrats
- Hobbes, 1962, Leviathan
- Glover, 1970, Responsibility
- 1975, Watergate
- Hart, 1959, Causation in the Law
- Sjoberg, 1978, Bureaucratic Power in National Politics
- Ashabranner, 1971, A Moment in History
- Lukas, 1977, Nightmare
- Nelson, 1968, The Politics of Science
- Martin, 1966, Overtaken by Events
- Aristotle, 1963, The Works of Aristotle
- Thompson, 1981, Ethics in Government
- Friedlander, 1969, Kurt Cerstein
- Weisband, 1976, Resignation in Protest
- Kaufman, 1977, Red Tape
- Thompson, 1961, Modern Organizations
- Strawson, 1968, Studies in the Philosophy of Thought and Action
- Muller, 1967, Adlai Stevenson
- Kissinger, 1979, Letters, Economist, 272, 6
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework 1
Bovens, M. (2007) · European Law Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x · Cited by 2,667
Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration
O’Toole, L. J. (1997) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/976691 · Cited by 1,261
Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes
Black, J. (2008) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x · Cited by 1,215
Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust
Rosanvallon, P. (2008) · Cited by 660
Explaining Michigan: Developing an Ex Post Theory of a Quality Improvement Program
DIXON-WOODS, M., BOSK, C. L., AVELING, E. L., GOESCHEL, C. A., & PRONOVOST, P. J. (2011) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00625.x · Cited by 603
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, D. F.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thompson, Dennis F.
- ORCID
- Thompson, Dennis F.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1980-12
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 905-916
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2017558343
- Cited by
- 651
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 71 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 11.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Keywords
- moral responsibility, public officials, personal responsibility, collective responsibility, excuses, accountability, democratic accountability, causal criteria, state decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review