The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands
Abstract
That many different officials contribute in many different ways to decisions and policies in the modern state makes it difficult to ascribe moral responsibility to any official. The usual responses to this problem—based on concepts of hierarchical and collective responsibility—distort the notion of responsibility. The idea of personal responsibility—based on causal and volitional criteria—constitutes a better approach to the problem of ascribing responsibility to public officials. Corresponding to each of these criteria are types of excuses that officials use in defending the decisions they make. An analysis of the conditions under which the excuses eliminate or mitigate responsibility provides a foundation for accountability in a democracy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As a matter of fact, other intelligent, autonomous entities with 'no soul to blame and no body to kick' (Asaro, 2012), such as, e.g. bureaucracies and corporates, may in themselves generate gaps in culpability.”
From Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and How to Address them (2021) · cites this paper as Thompson, 1980
In the citing paper
“In this way, the introduction of AI makes the 'problem of many hands' (Bovens, 1998; Thompson, 1980) more acute: data coming from different sources are introduced and enriched at different points in the data chain.”
From Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and How to Address them (2021) · cites this paper as Thompson, 1980
Citations
Cites
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person
Frankfurt, H. G. (1971) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2024717 · Cited by 4,663
(1970) · Cited by 3,618
Strawson, P. F. (1962) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 3,223
Edelman, M. J. (1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,047
Weldon, T. D., Kant, I., & Beck, L. W. (1949) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2182818 · Cited by 2,030
The Symbolic Uses of Politics.
Dawson, R. E., & Edelman, M. J. (1965) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109203 · Cited by 1,858
Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment
Hečlo, H. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,239
The New American Political System
Smith, G., & King, A. (1979) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20040234 · Cited by 1,175
Hart, H. L. A., & Gardner, J. B. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534777.001.0001 · Cited by 1,146
Utilitarianism: For and Against.
Ellis, A., Smart, J. J. C., Williams, B., & Quinton, A. M. (1974) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2217943 · Cited by 1,112
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bok, 1978, Lying
- Lowi, 1979, The End of Liberalism
- Truman, 1955, Memoirs, Vol. 1, Years of Decisions
- 1971, In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer
- Rohr, 1978, Ethics for Bureaucrats
- Hobbes, 1962, Leviathan
- Glover, 1970, Responsibility
- 1975, Watergate
- Hart, 1959, Causation in the Law
- Sjoberg, 1978, Bureaucratic Power in National Politics
- Ashabranner, 1971, A Moment in History
- Lukas, 1977, Nightmare
- Nelson, 1968, The Politics of Science
- Martin, 1966, Overtaken by Events
- Aristotle, 1963, The Works of Aristotle
- Thompson, 1981, Ethics in Government
- Friedlander, 1969, Kurt Cerstein
- Weisband, 1976, Resignation in Protest
- Kaufman, 1977, Red Tape
- Thompson, 1961, Modern Organizations
- Strawson, 1968, Studies in the Philosophy of Thought and Action
- Muller, 1967, Adlai Stevenson
- Kissinger, 1979, Letters, Economist, 272, 6
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework 1
Bovens, M. (2007) · European Law Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x · Cited by 2,667
Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration
O’Toole, L. J. (1997) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/976691 · Cited by 1,261
Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes
Black, J. (2008) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x · Cited by 1,215
Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust
Rosanvallon, P. (2008) · Cited by 660
Explaining Michigan: Developing an Ex Post Theory of a Quality Improvement Program
DIXON-WOODS, M., BOSK, C. L., AVELING, E. L., GOESCHEL, C. A., & PRONOVOST, P. J. (2011) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00625.x · Cited by 603
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, D. F.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thompson, Dennis F.
- ORCID
- Thompson, Dennis F.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1980-12
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 905-916
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2017558343
- Cited by
- 651
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 71 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 11.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Keywords
- moral responsibility, public officials, personal responsibility, collective responsibility, excuses, accountability, democratic accountability, causal criteria, state decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
