The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interest Representation: The Dominance of Institutions
Abstract
Interest group theory traditionally assumed that policies advocated by group representatives in some sense grow out of the interests or values of the group's members. Mancur Olson and others compelled important revisions in this assumption, but still left the process of interest advocacy to membership groups. It is contended here that institutions, such as corporations or local governments, occupy a dominant position with respect to interest representation in Washington, and this finding requires substantial revisions in both theoretical and descriptive formulations of the governmental process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
Fenichel Pitkin, H. (1967) · doi:10.1525/9780520340503 · Cited by 5,162
Cited by
Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees
Hall, R. L., & Wayman, F. W. (1990) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1962767 · Cited by 932
Galaskiewicz, J. (1985) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.001433 · Cited by 553
Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise
Rich, A. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511509889 · Cited by 499
Bouwen, P. (2004) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00157.x · Cited by 432
The evolution of the large firm as a political actor in the European Union
Coen, D. (1997) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/135017697344253 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Salisbury, R. H.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1984-03
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-76
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2102834054
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 49.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interest Representation: The Dominance of Institutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1961249
- The paper
- Salisbury, R. H. (1984). Interest Representation: The Dominance of Institutions. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
