Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs.

Hendrickson, Leslie, Cronbach, Lee J.·1983·Contemporary Sociology

DOI 10.2307/2068975

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2068975

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553
Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores
Kane, M. T. (2013) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/jedm.12000 · Cited by 2,110
What Would It Take to Change an Inference? Using Rubin’s Causal Model to Interpret the Robustness of Causal Inferences
Frank, K. A., Maroulis, S. J., Duong, M. Q., & Kelcey, B. M. (2013) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373713493129 · Cited by 406
“Scaling-out” evidence-based interventions to new populations or new health care delivery systems
Aarons, G. A., Sklar, M., Mustanski, B., Benbow, N., & Brown, C. H. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0640-6 · Cited by 399
The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice
Davies, P. (2000) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/713688543 · Cited by 286
Replication and robustness in developmental research
Duncan, G. J., Engel, M., Claessens, A., & Dowsett, C. J. (2014) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037996 · Cited by 207
Community Science, Philosophy of Science, and the Practice of Research
Tebes, J. K. (2005) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-005-3399-x · Cited by 151
Random versus nonrandom assignment in controlled experiments: Do you get the same answer?
Shadish, W. R., & Ragsdale, K. (1996) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.64.6.1290 · Cited by 126
Beyond between-group differences: Considering race, ethnicity, and culture in research on positive youth development programs
Williams, J. L., & Deutsch, N. L. (2016) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888691.2015.1113880 · Cited by 109
Honoring Indigenous culture-as-intervention: Development and validity of the Native Wellness Assessment TM
Fiedeldey-Van Dijk, C., Rowan, M., Dell, C., Mushquash, C., Hopkins, C., Fornssler, B., Hall, L., Mykota, D., Farag, M., & Shea, B. (2017) · Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse · doi:10.1080/15332640.2015.1119774 · Cited by 88
How Bias Reduction Is Affected by Covariate Choice, Unreliability, and Mode of Data Analysis: Results From Two Types of Within-Study Comparisons
Cook, T. D., Steiner, P. M., & Pohl, S. (2009) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170903333673 · Cited by 81
Comments on Slavin : Synthesizing Causal Inferences
Briggs, D. C. (2008) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x08314286 · Cited by 45
Interaction of Theory and Practice to Assess External Validity
Leviton, L. C., & Trujillo, M. D. (2017) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x15625289 · Cited by 35
Challenges and Dilemmas in Implementing Random Assignment in Educational Research
Ong-Dean, C., Huie Hofstetter, C., & Strick, B. R. (2011) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1098214010376532 · Cited by 26
Meta-Analysis: A Case Study
Briggs, D. C. (2005) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x04272555 · Cited by 22
Panel Studies and Causal Inference
Biddle, B. J., Slavings, R. L., & Anderson, D. S. (1985) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/002188638502100108 · Cited by 14
How to Fool Yourself With Experiments in Testing Theories in Psychological Research.
Wittmann, W. W., & Klumb, P. L. (2006) · Strengthening research methodology: Psychological measurement and evaluation. · doi:10.1037/11384-010 · Cited by 6

Authors: Hendrickson, L., & Cronbach, L. J.
Venue: Contemporary Sociology
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Published: 1983-05
Volume: 12
Issue: 3
Pages: 309
ISSN: 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/2068975
OpenAlex: W1982260544
Cited by: 1,042
References: 0
FWCI: 42.55
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review