The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A System Resource Approach to Organizational Effectiveness
Abstract
The prevailing formal and implied conceptions of are examined and found deficient. When effectiveness is defined with reference to goal attainment, there are both methodological and conceptual problems, for the goals are those of persons (observers or members)-not of the organization itself-and there is in principle no possibility for stable consensus about the nature of the goals. When defined with reference to societal function, the values and standards for assessing are similarly external to the organization itself. An improved conceptual framework, derived from the systems model of organizations, is proposed; the framework emphasizes both the distinctiveness of the organization as an identifiable social structure and the interdependence of the organization with its environment. The interdependence takes the form of transactions in which scarce and valued resources are exchanged under competitive conditions. The organization's success over a period of time in this competition for resources-i.e., its bargaining position in a given environment-is regarded as an expression of its overall effectiveness. Since the resources are of various kinds, and the competitive relationships are multiple, and since there is interchangeability among classes of resources, the assessment of organizational effectiveness must be in terms not of any single criterion but of an open-ended multidimensional set of criteria. The implications of this conception for theory, for empirical investigation, and for organization management are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice
Child, J. (1972) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/003803857200600101 · Cited by 4,790
Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258398 · Cited by 3,503
Dess, G. G., & Robinson, R. B. (1984) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250050306 · Cited by 3,337
Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2010.495581 · Cited by 2,755
The interorganizational network as a political economy
Benson, J. K. (1975) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391696 · Cited by 1,048
Umbrella Advocates Versus Validity Police: A Life-Cycle Model
Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.2.199 · Cited by 609
Galaskiewicz, J. (1985) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.001433 · Cited by 553
Leadership, Membership, and Voice: Civic Associations That Work
Andrews, K. T., Ganz, M., Baggetta, M., Han, H., & Lim, C. (2010) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/649060 · Cited by 215
HRD interventions, employee competencies and organizational effectiveness: an empirical study
Potnuru, R. K. G., & Sahoo, C. K. (2016) · European Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1108/ejtd-02-2016-0008 · Cited by 113
Assessing the performance of health technology assessment organizations: A framework
Lafortune, L., Farand, L., Mondou, I., Sicotte, C., & Battista, R. (2008) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462307080105 · Cited by 37
Seo, J. (2020) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852318778782 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuchtman, E., & Seashore, S. E.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1967-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 891
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048473448
- Cited by
- 931
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.