Cited by 1,013Economic Theory and PolicyEconomic theories and modelsEconomic Theory and Institutions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics

Kaldor, Nicholas·1972·The Economic Journal

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2231304

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Kaldor, N.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Kaldor, Nicholas
Venue
The Economic Journal
Published
1972-12
Volume
82
Issue
328
Pages
1237
ISSN
0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980427659
Cited by
1,013
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 30
FWCI
26.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Economic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
Keywords
economic equilibrium, economic methodology, general equilibrium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review