The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing Brand Equity through Flow and Telepresence: A Comparison of 2d and 3d Virtual Worlds1
Abstract
This research uses theories of flow, telepresence, positive emotions, and brand equity to examine the effect of using two-dimensional versus three-dimensional virtual world environments on telepresence, enjoyment, brand equity, and behavioral intention. The findings suggest that the 3D virtual world environment produces both positive and negative effects on brand equity when compared to the 2D environment. The positive effect of the 3D virtual world environment on brand equity occurs through telepresence, a specific aspect of flow, as well as enjoyment. The negative effect on brand equity can be explained using distraction–conflict theory in which attentional conflicts faced by users of a highly interactive and rich medium resulted in distractions from attending to the brand. Brand equity, in turn, has a positive effect on behavioral intention. The results suggest that although the 3D virtual world environment has the potential to increase brand equity by offering an immersive and enjoyable virtual product experience, the rich environment can also be a distraction. Therefore, developers of virtual world branding sites need to take into account limitations in the information processing capacity and attention span of users when designing their sites in order to avoid cognitive overload, which can lead to users being distracted from branding information. This paper not only provides a theoretical foundation for explaining users’ experience with 2D versus 3D virtual world branding sites, but also provides insights to practitioners for designing 3D virtual world sites to enhance brand equity and intentions through user engagement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218 · Cited by 18,025
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 · Cited by 6,479
What good are positive emotions?
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300 · Cited by 6,066
Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence
Steuer, J. (1992) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x · Cited by 5,459
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726
Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions
Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C. S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D., Gaggioli, A., Botella, C., & Alcañiz, M. (2007) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9993 · Cited by 1,111
Cited by
The Needs–Affordances–Features Perspective for the Use of Social Media1
Karahanna, E., Xu, S. X., Xu, Y., & Zhang, N. (. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/11492 · Cited by 518
Does personal social media usage affect efficiency and well-being?
Brooks, S. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.053 · Cited by 434
Optimal experience of flow enhanced by telepresence: evidence from social media use
Pelet, J.-É., Ettis, S., & Cowart, K. (2017) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.05.001 · Cited by 354
Technology at the dinner table: Ordering food online through mobile apps
Kapoor, A. P., & Vij, M. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.04.001 · Cited by 347
Zhang, P. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.1.11 · Cited by 331
Daassi, M., & Debbabi, S. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103453 · Cited by 239
Mütterlein, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.174 · Cited by 238
Kim, J.-H., Kim, M., Park, M., & Yoo, J. (2023) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2022.101936 · Cited by 188
Mäntymäki, M., & Riemer, K. (2014) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.12.010 · Cited by 112
Kao, T.-W. (., & Lin, W. T. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.006 · Cited by 87
Augmented reality (AR) marketing and consumer responses: a study of cue-utilization and habituation
Söderström, C., Mikalef, P., Dypvik Landmark, A., & Gupta, S. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114813 · Cited by 51
Temporal Presence Variation in Immersive Computer Games
Chung, J., & Gardner, H. J. (2012) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.627298 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Nah, F. F.-H., Eschenbrenner, B., & DeWester, D.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2011-09-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 731-A19
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W2290295444
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 59.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
