Cited by 1,111Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsSocial Robot Interaction and HRIMedia Influence and Health

Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions

Riva, Giuseppe, Mantovani, Fabrizia, Capideville, Claret Samantha, Preziosa, Alessandra, Morganti, Francesca, Villani, Daniela, Gaggioli, Andrea, Botella, Cristina +1 more·2007·CyberPsychology & Behavior

Abstract

Many studies showed the ability of movies and imagery techniques to elicit emotions. Nevertheless, it is less clear how to manipulate the content of interactive media to induce specific emotional responses. In particular, this is true for the emerging medium virtual reality (VR), whose main feature is the ability to induce a feeling of "presence" in the computer-generated world experienced by the user. The main goal of this study was to analyze the possible use of VR as an affective medium. Within this general goal, the study also analyzed the relationship between presence and emotions. The results confirmed the efficacy of VR as affective medium: the interaction with "anxious" and "relaxing" virtual environments produced anxiety and relaxation. The data also showed a circular interaction between presence and emotions: on one side, the feeling of presence was greater in the "emotional" environments; on the other side, the emotional state was influenced by the level of presence. The significance of these results for the assessment of affective interaction is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cpb.2006.9993

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C. S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D., Gaggioli, A., Botella, C., & Alcañiz, M.
Affiliations
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
  • Universitat Jaume I (ES)
  • Medical Image Computing Laboratory (MEDICLAB), Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.
Venue
CyberPsychology & Behavior
Published
2007-02
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
45-56
ISSN
  • 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8364
OpenAlex
W1995474267
Cited by
1,111
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 22
FWCI
23.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CyberPsychology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aisberg (University of Bergamo) (submittedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
virtual reality, presence, emotions, emotional interaction, emotion induction, virtual worlds, anxiety, relaxation, affective evaluation
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, User-Computer Interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review