The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Models
Abstract
Three types of conflict among the subunits of formal organizations are identified: (1) bargaining conflict among the parties to an interestgroup relationship; (2) bureaucratic conflict between the parties to a superior-subordinate relationship; and (3) systems conflict among parties to a lateral or working relationship. In each of the three cases, conflict is treated as a series of episodes, each episode including stages of latency, feeling, perception, manifestation, and aftermath. The organization's reaction to conflict in each case is analyzed using the Barnard-Simon model of inducements-contributions balance theory. Of particular interest is whether the organization members resolve conflicts by withdrawing from the organization, by altering the existing set of relationships, or by changing their values and behavior within the context of the existing relationships.1 Louis R. Pondy is assistant professor of business administration at the University of Pittsburgh.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
On the Measurement of Organizational Slack
Bourgeois, L. J. (1981) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1981.4287985 · Cited by 1,545
Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update
Thomas, K. W. (1992) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030130307 · Cited by 722
What goes around comes around: the impact of personal conflict style on work conflict and stress
Friedman, R. A., Tidd, S. T., Currall, S. C., & Tsai, J. C. (2000) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/eb022834 · Cited by 500
Relationships at Work: Toward a Multidimensional Conceptualization of Dyadic Work Relationships
Ferris, G. R., Liden, R. C., Munyon, T. P., Summers, J. K., Basik, K. J., & Buckley, M. R. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309344741 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Pondy, L. R.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1967-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 296
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976630138
- Cited by
- 1,369
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2391553
- The paper
- Pondy, L. R. (1967). Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Models. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391553
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.