Police Work: The Social Organization of Policing.

Jermier, John M., Manning, Peter K.·1979·Administrative Science Quarterly

DOI 10.2307/2392375

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2392375

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

NEGOTIATING ORDER IN PATROL WORK: AN ECOLOGICAL THEORY OF POLICE RESPONSE TO DEVIANCE*
KLINGER, D. A. (1997) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1997.tb00877.x · Cited by 645
Organizational stressors and police performance
Shane, J. M. (2010) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.05.008 · Cited by 389
REFORMING TO PRESERVE: COMPSTAT AND STRATEGIC PROBLEM SOLVING IN AMERICAN POLICING*
WEISBURD, D., MASTROFSKI, S. D., MCNALLY, A. M., GREENSPAN, R., & WILLIS, J. J. (2003) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2003.tb00006.x · Cited by 389
Compliance on Demand: The Public's Response to Specific Police Requests
MASTROFSKI, S. D., SNIPES, J. B., & SUPINA, A. E. (1996) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0022427896033003001 · Cited by 358
Race and place: The ecology of racial profiling African American motorists
Meehan, A. J., & Ponder, M. C. (2002) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418820200095291 · Cited by 291
Mirage of Police Reform: Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy
University at Albany, S., Worden, R. E., McLean, S. J., & John F. Finn Institute for Public Safety, U. (2017) · Luminos · doi:10.1525/luminos.30 · Cited by 141
POLICE CULTURE AND OFFICER BEHAVIOR: APPLICATION OF A MULTILEVEL FRAMEWORK
INGRAM, J. R., TERRILL, W., & PAOLINE, E. A. (2018) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12192 · Cited by 133
Can You Build a Better Cop?: Experimental Evidence on Supervision, Training, and Policing in the Community
Owens, E., Weisburd, D., Amendola, K. L., & Alpert, G. P. (2018) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12337 · Cited by 111
The Response of Business to Social Regulation in England and Wales: An Enforcement Perspective*
HAWKINS, K., & HUTTER, B. M. (1993) · Law & Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.1993.tb00103.x · Cited by 84
Alcohol Intoxication and Violent Crime: Implications for Public Health Policy
McClelland, G. M., & Teplin, L. A. (2001) · The American Journal on Addictions · doi:10.1080/10550490150504155 · Cited by 76
Towards a Sociological Theory of Discretion
CAMPBELL, E. (1999) · International Journal of the Sociology of Law · doi:10.1006/ijsl.1999.0082 · Cited by 70
Social media, socialization, and pursuing legitimation of police violence*
Cheng, T. (2021) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12277 · Cited by 44
De-Escalation Training Receptivity and First-Line Police Supervision: Findings from the Louisville Metro Police Study
Engel, R. S., Isaza, G. T., Motz, R. T., McManus, H. D., & Corsaro, N. (2022) · Police Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10986111211049834 · Cited by 14
Settling institutional uncertainty: Policing Chicago and New York, 1877–1923
Koehler, J., & Cheng, T. (2023) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12337 · Cited by 4

Authors: Jermier, J. M., & Manning, P. K.
Venue: Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher: JSTOR
Published: 1979-12
Volume: 24
Issue: 4
Pages: 688
ISSN: 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/2392375
OpenAlex: W2314180392
Cited by: 631
References: 0
FWCI: 44.20
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review