The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring and Assessing Organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.
AMABILE, T. M., CONTI, R., COON, H., LAZENBY, J., & HERRON, M. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256995 · Cited by 6,029
The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms
Miller, D. (1983) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770 · Cited by 5,853
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.2.141 · Cited by 4,179
A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict
Jehn, K. A. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393638 · Cited by 4,050
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667054 · Cited by 3,359
Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250030102 · Cited by 2,758
Jarillo, J. C. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090104 · Cited by 2,555
Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation
Finkelstein, S. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256485 · Cited by 2,389
What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology
McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2001.11044235 · Cited by 2,282
FIT, EQUIFINALITY, AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: A TEST OF TWO CONFIGURATIONAL THEORIES.
DOTY, D. H., GLICK, W. H., & HUBER, G. P. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256810 · Cited by 1,198
Chief Executive Personality and Corporate Strategy and Structure in Small Firms
Miller, D., & Toulouse, J.-M. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1389 · Cited by 780
The Collective Construction of Work Group Moods
Bartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667070 · Cited by 678
The Dynamics of Interorganizational Coordination
de Ven, A. H. V., & Walker, G. (1984) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392941 · Cited by 532
Recognizing and Utilizing Expertise in Work Groups: A Status Characteristics Perspective
Bunderson, J. S. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556637 · Cited by 527
Carter, C. R., & Carter, J. R. (1998) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb01358.x · Cited by 457
Boundary spanners’ identification, intergroup contact, and effective intergroup relations
Richter, A. W., West, M. A., van Dick, R., & Dawson, J. F. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.23478720 · Cited by 376
The Effects of Cultural Diversity in Virtual Teams Versus Face-to-Face Teams
Staples, D. S., & Zhao, L. (2006) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-006-9042-x · Cited by 291
Communication in virtual teams: a conceptual framework and research agenda
Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., & Salas, E. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.005 · Cited by 291
Volberda, H. W., van der Weerdt, N., Verwaal, E., Stienstra, M., & Verdu, A. J. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0687 · Cited by 254
Impact of the digital divide on e-government: Expanding from channel choice to channel usage
Ebbers, W. E., Jansen, M. G. M., & van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.007 · Cited by 152
A review of literature on contingency theory in managerial accounting
Islam, J. (2012) · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT · doi:10.5897/ajbm11.2764 · Cited by 118
The Need for Assessment of Maintaining Variables in OBM
Austin, J., Carr, J. E., & Agnew, J. L. (1999) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1300/j075v19n02_05 · Cited by 85
Langfred, C. W. (2000) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640003100103 · Cited by 82
Task procrastination in organizations: a framework for research.
Harris, N. N., & Sutton, R. I. (1983) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872678303601102 · Cited by 73
Personality variables as predictors of Facebook usage
Caci, B., Cardaci, M., Tabacchi, M. E., & Scrima, F. (2014) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/21.09.pr0.114k23w6 · Cited by 62
The effect of individual and task characteristics on decision aid reliance
Parkes, A. (2017) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2016.1209242 · Cited by 26
Gales, L. M., & Boynton, A. C. (1992) · The Journal of High Technology Management Research · doi:10.1016/1047-8310(92)90010-y · Cited by 12
Pure and hybrid strategies in social enterprises: an empirical investigation
Salavou, H., & Manolopoulos, D. (2021) · EuroMed Journal of Business · doi:10.1108/emjb-05-2019-0068 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, J. L., de Ven, A. H. V., & Ferry, D. L.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1981-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 324
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005459481
- Cited by
- 1,648
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 56.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.