The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Power In and Around Organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation
Finkelstein, S. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256485 · Cited by 2,389
Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences
Rowley, T. J. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107 · Cited by 2,522
8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211628 · Cited by 2,385
Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2001) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00978.x · Cited by 1,409
Robey, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.2.167 · Cited by 765
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045699 · Cited by 707
Diversified Mentoring Relationships in Organizations: A Power Perspective
Ragins, B. R. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9707154067 · Cited by 724
Business cases for sustainability: a stakeholder theory perspective
Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026617722882 · Cited by 477
PROCEDURAL RATIONALITY IN THE STRATEGIC DECISION‐MAKING PROCESS*
Dean, J. W., & Sharfman, M. P. (1993) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00317.x · Cited by 412
Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition.
Hollander, E. P., & Offermann, L. R. (1990) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.2.179 · Cited by 411
Hochwarter, W. A., Witt, L. A., & Kacmar, K. M. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.472 · Cited by 193
Kacmar, K. M., Andrews, M. C., Harris, K. J., & Tepper, B. J. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1373-8 · Cited by 180
Advice Giving: A Subtle Pathway to Power
Schaerer, M., Tost, L. P., Huang, L., Gino, F., & Larrick, R. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167217746341 · Cited by 66
Government-Oriented Corporate Public Relation Strategies in Transitional China
He, Y., & Tian, Z. (2008) · Management and Organization Review · doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00119.x · Cited by 59
Influence and Political Processes in Cyberspace: The Case of Global Virtual Teams
Elron, E., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2006) · International Journal of Cross Cultural Management · doi:10.1177/1470595806070636 · Cited by 45
Sun, S., Burke, M., Chen, H., Tan, Y. (., Zhang, J., & Hou, L. (2022) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726721992849 · Cited by 34
The Multinational Corporation as a Playing Field of Power: A Bourdieusian Approach
Delmestri, G., & Brumana, M. (2017) · Multinational Corporations and Organization Theory: Post Millennium Perspectives · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20160000049011 · Cited by 11
مصطفى, أ. ب. ف. (2019) · المجلة العملیة التجارة والتمویل · doi:10.21608/caf.2019.126254
Metadata
- Authors
- Krackhardt, D., & Mintzberg, H.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1985-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 597
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012669847
- Cited by
- 2,376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 73.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.