Cited by 713Organizational Change and LeadershipOrganizational Management and ChangeManagement and Organizational Studies

Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation

Open access
Haveman, Heather A.·1992·Administrative Science Quarterly

Abstract

Heather A. Haveman, Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Organizational Change and Performance Under Conditions of Fundamental Environmental Transformation, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 1 (Mar., 1992), pp. 48-75

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2393533

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Blau, Peter M. 1977 Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
  2. Carroll, Glenn R. 1987 Publish or Perish: The Organizational Ecology of Newspaper Industries. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  3. Eichler, Ned 1989 The Thrift Debacle. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  4. Haveman, Heather A. 1990 "Structural inertia revisited: Change and performance in the California savings and loan industry." Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  5. Thompson, James D. 1967 Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill. 74/ASQ, March 1992 All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haveman, H. A.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Haveman, Heather A.
Venue
Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1992-03
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
48
ISSN
0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030508328
Cited by
713
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 26
FWCI
18.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Administrative Science Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
organizational change, organizational performance, environmental transformation, environmental change, organizational adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review