The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drop Your Tools: An Allegory for Organizational Studies
Abstract
concepts of administrative processes must be operationalized and new ones developed or borrowed from the basic social sciences. Available knowledge in scattered sources needs to be assembled and analyzed. Research must go beyond description and must be reflected against theory. It must study the obvious as well as the unknown. The pressure for immediately applicable results must be reduced. At first this sounds like standard visionary boilerplate. On closer inspection, it foreshadows values that stand up well
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393701 · Cited by 2,426
DENNETT, D. C. (1995) · The Sciences · doi:10.1002/j.2326-1951.1995.tb03633.x · Cited by 1,975
Knowing-In-Action: The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology
Schön, D. A. (1995) · Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning · doi:10.1080/00091383.1995.10544673 · Cited by 861
Cited by
Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M., & Francis, J. J. (2017) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8 · Cited by 3,938
10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211644 · Cited by 2,571
Developing design propositions through research synthesis
Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & van Aken, J. E. (2008) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607088020 · Cited by 1,057
Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities
Tang, J., Kacmar, K. M. (., & Busenitz, L. (2012) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.07.001 · Cited by 1,013
Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2009) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.413 · Cited by 804
“This is consistent with empirical research showing that heuristics are learned quickly and stabilize rapidly (Bingham, Eisenhardt, and Davis, 2009) and that real-time, improvisational learning is often not retained in new heuristics (Weick, 1996; Moorman and Miner, 1998).”
MethodOrganizational improvisation and organizational memory
Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259058 · Cited by 1,248
Westphal, J. D., & Bednar, M. K. (2005) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.2.262 · Cited by 404
Pre-Entry Knowledge, Learning, and the Survival of New Firms
Dencker, J. C., Gruber, M., & Shah, S. K. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0387 · Cited by 369
Burton-Jones, A., McLean, E. R., & Monod, E. (2015) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.31 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Weick, K. E.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000216737
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
