CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 281Employer Branding and e-HRMAI and HR TechnologiesInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human Resource Information Systems: A Current Assessment

DeSanctis, Gerardine·1986·MIS Quarterly
DOI 10.2307/248875
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Human resource information systems (HRIS) have become a major MIS subfunction within the personnel areas of many large corporations. This article traces the development of HRIS as an entity independent of centralized MIS, assesses its current operation and technological base, and considers its future role in the firm, especially its relationship to the centralized MIS function. The results of a survey of HRIS professionals from 171 U.S. corporations are described in order to provide an overview of the current design, operation, and effectiveness of HRIS. The findings of the survey are discussed in terms of their implications for management of human resource information systems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/248875

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Davis, 1984, Management information Systems: Conceptual Foundations
  2. Hennessey, 1979, Computer Applications in Human Resource Information Systems, Human Resource Planning, 2, 205
  3. Mathys, 1982, A Survey of the Human Resource Information Systems (HRIS) of Major Companies, Human Resource Planning, 5, 83
  4. Mayer, 1971, EDP Personnel Systems: What Areas Are Being Automated, Personnel, 48, 29
  5. Richards-Carpenter, 1982, Computers in Personnel — New Needs, New Methods, New Opportunities, Personnel Management, 14, 26
  6. Tomeski, 1973(), Information Systems in Personnel: Part I, Journal of Systems Management, 24, 18
  7. Tomeski, 1973(), Information Systems in Personnel: Part II, Journal of Systems Management, 24, 39
  8. Tomeski, 1976, Computer-Related Challenges for Personnel Administrators, Personnel Journal, 55, 300
  9. Wilkens, P.L. “An Analysis of the Attitudinal and Behavioral Impact of a Human Resource Information System,” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus Ohio, 1971.
  10. Zientara, 1983, New Job Links DP, Personnel Management, Computerworld, 17, 8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 281

Related

Metadata

Authors
DeSanctis, G.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
DeSanctis, Gerardine
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
1986-03-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
15-27
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
DOI
10.2307/248875
OpenAlex
W1760209353
Cited by
281
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 28
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
human resource information systems, centralized information system, personnel management, large corporations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review