The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence from the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry
Open accessAbstract
Neoclassical theory suggests that when an industry is shaken by radical technological change, incumbent firms will be replaced by entrants because entrants have greater strategic incentives to invest in radical innovation. Organizational theory suggests that incumbent firms fail in the face of radical innovation because they fall prey to inertia and complacency. I show that if organizational effects are significant, tests of neoclassical theory in isolation will yield spurious or noisy results. Using data derived from a detailed field study of the photolithographic alignment equipment industry, I show that as neoclassical theory predicts, established firms invested more than entrants in incremental innovation, but that in agreement with organizational theory, the research efforts of incumbents seeking to exploit radical innovation were significantly less productive than those of entrants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation
Sørensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666980 · Cited by 1,862
Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity
Gilbert, C. G. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.18803920 · Cited by 1,375
The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history
Helfat, C. E. (2002) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/11.4.725 · Cited by 1,087
Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S., & Tushman, M. L. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/3560246 · Cited by 870
Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research
Christensen, C. M., McDonald, R., Altman, E. J., & Palmer, J. E. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12349 · Cited by 789
Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0401 · Cited by 774
Banking deregulation and innovation
Chava, S., Oettl, A., Subramanian, A., & Subramanian, K. V. (2013) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.03.015 · Cited by 618
Cattani, G. (2006) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtj016 · Cited by 251
Bohlmann, J. D., Golder, P. N., & Mitra, D. (2002) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.9.1175.175 · Cited by 180
Wesseling, J. H., Niesten, E. M. M. I., Faber, J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1834 · Cited by 128
Entrepreneurial spawning and knowledge-based perspective: A meta-analysis
Garrett, R. P., Miao, C., Qian, S., & Bae, T. J. (2017) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9842-1 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Henderson, R.
- Venue
- The RAND Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 248
- ISSN
- 0741-6261 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024205899
- Cited by
- 1,015
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
