The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Leader Contingent and Noncontingent Reward and Punishment Behaviors on Subordinate Performance and Satisfaction.
Abstract
This study investigated the nature of the relationships between leader reward and punishment behaviors and subordinate performance and satisfaction. Only performance-contingent reward behavior was found to affect subordinate performance significantly. Positive relationships were found between leader contingent reward behavior and employee satisfaction. Contingent punishment had no effects on subordinate performance or satisfaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Cited by
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7 · Cited by 5,628
Self-citationThe job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 · Cited by 4,760
Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership.
Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207 · Cited by 3,026
Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.891 · Cited by 2,159
The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior.
Skogstad, A., Einarsen, S., Torsheim, T., Aasland, M. S., & Hetland, H. (2007) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.80 · Cited by 864
Bommer, W. H., Rich, G. A., & Rubin, R. S. (2005) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.342 · Cited by 522
Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings.
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.557 · Cited by 505
Newell, S., & Marabelli, M. (2015) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2015.02.001 · Cited by 494
Leadership and Public Service Motivation in U.S. Federal Agencies
Park, S. M., & Rainey, H. G. (2008) · International Public Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10967490801887954 · Cited by 307
Does the Job Satisfaction—Job Performance Relationship Vary Across Cultures?
Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., & Yim, F. H. K. (2009) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022109339208 · Cited by 123
Gagné, M., Morin, A. J. S., Schabram, K., Wang, Z. N., Chemolli, E., & Briand, M. (2020) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-019-09649-4 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Podsakoff, P. M., Todor, W. M., & Skov, R.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1982-12-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 810-821
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2067999751
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.