The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Of Conspiracy Theories
Abstract
As the end of the Millennium approaches, conspiracy theories are increasing in number and popularity. In this short essay, I offer an analysis of conspiracy theories inspired by Hume's discussion of miracles. My first conclusion is that whereas Hume can argue that miracles are, by definition, explanations we are not warranted in believing, there is nothing analytic that will allow us to distinguish good from bad conspiracy theories. There is no a priori method for distinguishing warranted conspiracy theories (say, those explaining Watergate) from those which are unwarranted (say, theories about extraterrestrials abducting humans). Nonetheless, there is a cluster of characteristics often shared by unwarranted conspiracy theories. An analysis of the alleged explanatory virtues of unwarranted conspiracies suggests some reasons for their current popularity, while at the same time providing grounds for their rejection. Finally, I discuss how conspiracy theories embody an anachronistic world-view that places the contemporary zeitgeist in a clearer light.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“conspiracy theories rely on isolated morsels of evidence inconsistent with an official account [31] (e.g., that Timothy McVeigh fled the Oklahoma City bombing in a car without licence plates) while ignoring overwhelming evidence to the contrary”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“evidence against conspiracy theories is often construed as evidence for them, because the evidence is interpreted as arising from the conspiracy in question”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 585
What Makes People Join Conspiracy Communities?: Role of Social Factors in Conspiracy EngagementPreprint
Phadke, S., Samory, M., & Mitra, T. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.04527 · Cited by 31
“rces [57] and tendency to believe unsubstantiated or false claims [43]. Previous studies stress that the need for justifying or explaining events forms the very foundation for conspiratorial thinking [30, 42, 62, 64]. For example,van Prooijen et al. found that people feel the need to detect patterns or “connect the do…”
BackgroundLes théories du complot et le paradoxe de l’individualisme épistémique
Guillon, J.-B. (2019) · Diogène · doi:10.3917/dio.261.0054 · Cited by 13
Conspiracy Theories and Religion: Reframing Conspiracy Theories as Bliks
Bezalel, G. Y. (2019) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2019.46 · Cited by 13
“UCTs, therefore, should “warrant a degree of scepticism, rather than outright dismissal” (Keeley 1999: 118).”
BackgroundInfluentialRethinking conspiracy theories
Shields, M. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03811-x · Cited by 13
“Keith Harris has recently argued for this approach, citing kindred observations from other philosophers (Feldman, 2011; Keeley, 1999).21 We can stipulate that the concept refers to “only those theories that run counter to the official account of some target event” (Harris, 2018, p. 237).”
BackgroundOn the epistemology of conspiracy
Peters, M. A. (2020) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2020.1741331 · Cited by 13
Fenster, M. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 13
Lantian, A., Bagneux, V., Delouvée, S., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8qhx4 · Cited by 13
Мусолфф, А. (2022) · Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture · doi:10.1075/dapsac.98.06mus · Cited by 12
Zeng, J., & Brennen, S. B. (2023) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2023.4.1725 · Cited by 18
“Conspiracy theory”: The case for being critically receptive
Hayward, T. (2021) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12432 · Cited by 12
“(Keeley 1999, 116) Keeley additionally notes a few things about this definition.”
BackgroundInfluentialConspiratorial thinking in the Latino community on the 2020 election
Cortina, J., & Rottinghaus, B. (2022) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/20531680221083535 · Cited by 11
“Conspiratorial thinking from individuals explains political or historical events through references to “the machinations of powerful people” (Aaronovitch 2010; Byford 2011; Coady 2019; Dentith and Orr 2018; Jerit and Zhao 2020; Keeley 1999; Sunstein and Adarian, 2009).”
BackgroundKüçükaydın, M. A., Seher, E. S. E. N., & Gürbüzer, S. (2023) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4120 · Cited by 12
Conspiracy theory and American foreign policy
Aistrope, T. (2016) · Manchester University Press eBooks · doi:10.7765/9781784997373 · Cited by 12
Zwar, L., König, H., & Hajek, A. (2022) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-022-03177-0 · Cited by 10
Marques, F. P. J., Ferracioli, P., Comel, N., & Kniess, A. B. (2023) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/14648849231165579 · Cited by 11
“If the in fl uence of such “ theories ” had been underestimated in past decades (Keeley, 1999), the increasing use of social media and the weaponization of false information now require multiple disciplinary perspectives to explain the topic (Douglas et al., 2019; Shahsavari et al., 2020).”
BackgroundA proliferação das fake news nas eleições brasileiras de 2018
Jardelino, F., Cavalcanti, D. B., & Toniolo, B. P. (2020) · Comunicação pública · doi:10.4000/cp.7438 · Cited by 17
Conspiracy Theories and Democratic Legitimacy
Mittendorf, W. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2172700 · Cited by 11
“The particularist position does not deny the irrationality of many conspiracy theories, its main point is that just because some explanation is a conspiracy theory does not thereby require its irrationality (Keeley 1999).”
BackgroundConspiracy Theory and (or as) Folk Psychology
Keeley, B. L. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2191290 · Cited by 11
“This is how I define the concept in (Keeley 1999, 116ff) and subsequent work.”
BackgroundSelf-citationHall, J. A. (2006) · Howard Journal of Communications · doi:10.1080/10646170600829626 · Cited by 11
Popper’s Philosophy and the Methodology of Social Science
Jarvie, I. C. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cco9781139046503.011 · Cited by 11
“Resistance!”: Collective Action Cues in Conspiracy Theory-Endorsing Facebook Groups
Frischlich, L. (2022) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v10i2.5182 · Cited by 16
“However, con‐ spiracy theories in a narrower sense are often unwar‐ ranted (Keeley, 1999): They typically oppose common knowledge (counter‐hegemonical) and are immune to counter‐evidence.”
BackgroundMeuer, M., Oeberst, A., & Imhoff, R. (2022) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2903 · Cited by 14
Plots: Space, Conspiracy, and Contingency in William Gibson's Pattern Recognition and Spook Country
Kneale, J. (2011) · Environment and Planning D Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d10509 · Cited by 11
Herman, T., & Oswald, S. (2022) · Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture · doi:10.1075/dapsac.98.05her · Cited by 10
Combatting conspiracies in the classroom: Teacher strategies and perceived outcomes
Jerome, L., Kisby, B., & McKay, S. E. (2024) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3955 · Cited by 10
Persily, N., & Tucker, J. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.002 · Cited by 11
Responding to the spread of conspiracy theories
Shoaibi, N. (2022) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2022.2126393 · Cited by 10
“As far as I can tell, the first mention of something resembling epistemic preemption (not under this label) as a means of the spread of CTs goes back to Keeley (1999): By invoking a conspiracy hypothesis, large amounts of ‘evidence’ are thrown into question.”
BackgroundThe Applied Epistemology of Official Stories
Hayward, T. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2227950 · Cited by 10
“Like the world itself, they are made up of too many people with too many different agendas to be easily controlled’ (1999, 124).”
BackgroundRépéter n’est pas croire. Sur la transmission des idées conspirationnistes
Delouvée, S. (2016) · Diogène · doi:10.3917/dio.249.0088 · Cited by 10
Meuer, M., Oeberst, A., & Imhoff, R. (2021) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.587 · Cited by 9
Clarke, S. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2057369 · Cited by 11
“The theory expanded over time to include FBI agents, other federal agencies, and members of the press (Keeley 1999, 122).”
BackgroundZembylas, M. (2021) · Pedagogy Culture and Society · doi:10.1080/14681366.2021.1948911 · Cited by 10
“‘Conspiracy theories’ are explanations of events or phenomena that attribute their main cause to a group of conspirators acting in secret for their own benefit and against the public good (Keeley 1999; Räikkä 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialMorosoli, S., Aelst, P. V., & van Erkel, P. F. A. (2022) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565221105792 · Cited by 11
Arab news networks and conspiracy theories about America: A political gratification study
Al-Kandari, A. A. (2010) · Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research · doi:10.1386/jammr.3.1-2.59_1 · Cited by 10
Unveiling the formation of conspiracy theory on social media: A discourse analysis
Li, B., Ji, D., Fu, M., Tan, C., Chong, A. Y., & Lim, E. T. K. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962231175923 · Cited by 13
“Based on these de fi nitions, this study de fi nes conspiracy theory as the explanation by reference of the secret machi-nations of a small group of people who usually have a certain level of power (Keeley, 1999; Sunstein and Vermeule, 2009; Dentith, 2014; March and Springer, 2019).”
Toward a Cultural Psychology of Conspiracy Theories: A life-narrative analysis of Flat Earthers
Pahuus, K., Jørgensen, M. S., & Wagoner, B. (2024) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-024-09857-5 · Cited by 9
Conspiracy Beliefs and the Perception of Intergroup Inequalities
Nera, K., Douglas, K. M., Bertin, P., Delouvée, S., & Klein, O. (2024) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672241279085 · Cited by 11
“For example, Keeley (1999) defined a conspiracy theory as a “proposed explanation of some historical event (or events) in terms of the significant causal agency of a relatively small group of persons” (p. 116; see also Douglas et al., 2019).”
Coronavirus meets the clash of civilizations
de Albuquerque, A., de Oliveira, T. M., dos Santos, M. A., Quinan, R., & Mazur, D. (2022) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565221105789 · Cited by 9
Towards a Conceptual Framework for Conspiracy Theory Theories
Pfeifer, N. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2172698 · Cited by 9
“CTs also contain claims about errant data (Keeley 1999) like events not explained by the received view or events which actually contradict claims made within the received view.”
BackgroundPsychologia myślenia spiskowego
Grzesiak-Feldman, M. (2016) · Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego eBooks · doi:10.31338/uw.9788323522157 · Cited by 5
Comprehending Covidiocy Communication
Spitzberg, B. H. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119751809.ch2 · Cited by 13
Of Precarity and Conspiracy: Introducing A Socio-Functional Model of Conspiracy BeliefsPreprint
Adam‐Troian, J., Chayinska, M., Paladino, M. P., Uluğ, Ö. M., Vaes, J., & Wagner‐Egger, P. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/mnfrd · Cited by 9
“I’m Not Saying It Was Aliens”: An Archaeological and Philosophical Analysis of a Conspiracy Theory
Turner, D. D., & Turner, M. I. (2021) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61052-4_2 · Cited by 9
“…observed that ancient aliens theory is a bit like a conspiracy theory, they seem unaware of relevant philosophical discussion of the structure of conspiracy theories (Keeley 1999; Basham 2003; Keeley 2003).4 We offer an analysis of ancient alien narratives that combines ideas from both disciplines.”
BackgroundInfluentialWhen alienated from society, conspiracy theory belief gives meaning to life
Schnell, T., Viviani, R., Lenz, C., & Krampe, H. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34557 · Cited by 11
A critical conceptualization of conspiracy theory
Koper, A. J. (2023) · Constellations · doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12683 · Cited by 8
Lewandowsky, S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0010 · Cited by 12
Faking and Conspiring about COVID-19: A Discursive Approach
Scardigno, R., Paparella, A. N., & D’Errico, F. (2022) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5660 · Cited by 8
‘Conspiracy Theory’ as a Tonkish Term: Some Runabout Inference-Tickets from Truth to Falsehood
Pigden, C. R. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2212379 · Cited by 8
“See for example, Keeley (1999), Coady (2003), Basham (2003), Hagen (2020), and Dentith (2014).”
Thomson, R., & Ito, N. (2012) · International Journal of Cyber Society and Education · Cited by 8
Repeating is not believing: the transmission of conspiracy theories
Delouvée, S. (2015) · Diogenes · doi:10.1177/0392192120945609 · Cited by 6
Negativity bias in the spread of voter fraud conspiracy theory tweets during the 2020 US electionPreprint
Youngblood, M., Stubbersfield, J., Morin, O., et al. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2jksg · Cited by 8
Nera, K., & Schöpfer, C. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/t8fhj · Cited by 8
Kim, Y., & Lim, H. D. (2024) · Journal of Public Relations Research · doi:10.1080/1062726x.2024.2333549 · Cited by 8
Barbosa de Andrade Aragão, R., Bastos Lima, M. G., Burns, G. L., Ross, H., & Biggs, D. (2024) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103267 · Cited by 12
Serani, D. (2022) · Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica · doi:10.1017/ipo.2021.56 · Cited by 8
“Most of the time, conspiracy theories contradict each other (Wood et al., 2012), but because these theories are not falsifiable (Keeley, 1999), ‘conspiracy believers do not seem to evaluate specific stories in their own merit, but they rather tend to accept the whole package’ (Brothertorn et al.,…”
BackgroundBrügger, N. (2022) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565221104989 · Cited by 10
“…conspiracy theories have been studied for years (for overviews, see Van Prooijen and Douglas, 2018; Uscinski, 2018), and different de fi nitions have been promoted (for instance Keeley, 1999: 116 – 118; Douglas and Sutton, 2018: 256 – 259; Uscinski, 2018: 235 – 236; Douglas et al., 2019: 4 – 5).”
Background`I-know-it-when-I-see-it' - Motivating Examples in the Psychology of Conspiracy Theory Theory
Dentith, M. R. X. (2024) · Routledge Open Research · doi:10.12688/routledgeopenres.17931.2 · Cited by 7
A prolegomena to investigating conspiracy theories
Dentith, M. R. X. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2375782 · Cited by 7
We Believe! Online Representations of the Olympic Winner as a Mythic Hero
Voolaid, P., & Laineste, L. (2013) · Folklore Electronic Journal of Folklore · doi:10.7592/fejf2013.54.voolaid_laineste · Cited by 7
Contesting Epistemic Authority: Conspiracy Theories on the Boundaries of Science
Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69649-8_8 · Cited by 7
Tomas, F., Nera, K., & Schöpfer, C. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/qgtzb · Cited by 7
Trust Nobody: How Voters React To Conspiracy TheoriesPreprint
Invernizzi, G. M., & Mohamed, A. E. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3507190 · Cited by 6
Conspiracy theories and the epistemic power of narratives
Munro, D. (2024) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2024.2381538 · Cited by 7
“There are various ways to further cash out this idea (see, e.g., Cassam, 2016; Keeley, 1999; Levy, 2007; Nguyen, 2020).”
Baća, B. (2024) · Theory Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/02632764241258404 · Cited by 7
“To maintain a ‘unified explanation’ accounting for the ‘ordered universe’ (Keeley, 1999: 119–23) – which is seen as ‘governed by design’ (Barkun, 2003: 3) – conspiracy theories exhibit three pseudoscientific traits: first, they are ‘highly selective both in their approach to evidence and in…”
Rationalities of conspiracy theories: A Weberian analysis of Turkish parliamentary debates
Nefes, T. S. (2025) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/13540688251316067 · Cited by 7
“The study began with the creation of a list of keywords based on Keeley ’ s (1999) de fi nition of conspiracy theory: a speci fi c explanation of an event that attributes signi fi cant causal agency to a relatively small group of individuals — the conspirators — acting covertly to achieve their aims.”
Revisiting Maher’s One-Factor Theory of Delusion
Nie, C. (2023) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-023-09521-6 · Cited by 6
Schepisi, M., Gjoneska, B., Mari, S., Panasiti, M. S., Porciello, G., & Imhoff, R. (2023) · Journal of Trust Research · doi:10.1080/21515581.2023.2248083 · Cited by 5
“…explanations of (natural, historical and social) events through the lens of secret plots that are contrived by a small, but pivotal group of people (Keeley, 1999), and trust — de fi ned as ‘ a willingness to expose vulnerability to a trustee based on positive expectations that it will not be…”
BackgroundJennings, F. J., Neville-Shepard, R., Jackson, D. B., Magusiak, A., & Sigrist, K. (2024) · Southern Communication Journal · doi:10.1080/1041794x.2024.2308892 · Cited by 6
“Despite popular belief, conspiracy theories are usually backed by copious amounts of evidence, employing what Keeley (1999) has called “errant data” made of contradictory or unaccounted-for information, and various claims tying together unrelated people and events.”
BackgroundClarke, S. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2371482 · Cited by 6
Grazing Conundrum: Herdsmen-Farmers Conflict and Internal Security Crisis in Nigeria
Odigbo, J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8215-4_6 · Cited by 6
Daniel, L., & Harper, D. J. (2020) · Journal of Constructivist Psychology · doi:10.1080/10720537.2020.1837695 · Cited by 6
“However, it has proven difficult to formulate criteria which would differentiate between warranted and unwarranted conspiracy theories (Keeley, 1999; Pauly, 2020).”
BackgroundLi, Z.-T., Qiu, H.-F., & Zhou, Q. (2021) · International journal of human computer interactions · doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.1960726 · Cited by 4
“As a typical form of infodemic, conspiracy theories see significant social and political events as results of secret plots between powerful agents (Keeley, 1999).”
BackgroundDo Conspiracies Tend to Fail? Philosophical Reflections on a Poorly Supported Academic Meme
Hagen, K. G. (2022) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2021.55 · Cited by 6
“Before addressing Keeley and Grimes, it is worth noting that, after Douglas et al. claim that conspiracy theories tend to fail, the very next sentence asserts: “When conspiracies fail – or are otherwise exposed – the appropriate experts deem them as having actually occurred” (Douglas et al. 2019: 4). In support of thi…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDemata, M., Zorzi, V., & Zottola, A. (2022) · Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture · doi:10.1075/dapsac.98.01dem · Cited by 6
Betting on Conspiracy: A Decision Theoretic Account of the Rationality of Conspiracy Theory Belief
Tsapos, M. (2024) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-024-00785-9 · Cited by 9
“According to the particularist, we cannot assess conspiracy theories as a class but, rather, conspiracy theories should be assessed on a case-by case basis (Basham, 2018; Coady, 2012; Dentith, 2016, 2019; Keeley, 1999).”
BackgroundHwang, T. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.012 · Cited by 12
Evaluating conspiracy claims as public sphere communication
Culloty, E. (2021) · Journal for Cultural Research · doi:10.1080/14797585.2021.1886421 · Cited by 6
Spekulative Kommunikation und ihre Stigmatisierung
Kuhn, O. E. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-19324-3_15 · Cited by 6
The Nature of Applied Philosophy
Lippert‐Rasmussen, K. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118869109.ch1 · Cited by 8
The Psychopathological Foundations of Conspiracy Theorists
Kumareswaran, D. J. (2014) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17008057 · Cited by 8
Hagen, K. G., Dentith, M. R. X., & Pigden, C. R. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2556850 · Cited by 6
Do Real and Invented Scandals Fuel Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories?
Wagner‐Egger, P., Fernandes, D. D. O., Carrel, J., & Delouvée, S. (2023) · European Journal of Psychology Open · doi:10.1024/2673-8627/a000034 · Cited by 5
Narrative Ecologies in Post-truth Times: Nostalgia and Conspiracy Theories in Narrative Jungles?
Gabriel, Y. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51697-0_2 · Cited by 5
Climate Change Conspiracy Theories
Räikkä, J. (2023) · Handbooks in philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16960-2_141-1 · Cited by 5
A Dynamic Analysis of Conspiratorial Narratives on Twitter During the Pandemic
Shao, C., Kwon, K. H., Walker, S., & Li, Q. (2023) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2022.0218 · Cited by 5
Watson, S. D. (2023) · Journal of Human Trafficking · doi:10.1080/23322705.2023.2193926 · Cited by 5
“…the term can be applied to any theory that “explains the ultimate causes of significant social and political events and circumstances with claims of secret plots by two or more powerful actors” (Aaronovitch, 2010; Coady, 2006; Dentith & Orr, 2017; Keeley, 1999; Sutton & Douglas, 2020, p. 118).”
'I-know-it-when-I-see-it' - Motivating Examples in the Social Psychology of Conspiracy Theory Theory
Dentith, M. R. X. (2023) · Routledge Open Research · doi:10.12688/routledgeopenres.17931.1 · Cited by 4
On epistemic black holes: How self‐sealing belief systems develop and evolve
Boudry, M., & Hofhuis, S. (2024) · Theoria · doi:10.1111/theo.12554 · Cited by 5
Wang, Z., Zhu, J., Zuo, W., Jiang, Z., Lei, J., & Wang, Z. (2025) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2025.2473991 · Cited by 5
Phillips, J. B. (2025) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/02654075251328116 · Cited by 5
“Conspiracies theories typically involve a secret — but powerful — group seeking to enact (and cover up) “ invariably nefarious ” social or political change (Keeley, 1999).”
Çalışkan, C. (2022) · Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies · doi:10.1080/14683857.2022.2137900 · Cited by 5
“A narrative as such explains and oversimplifies a complex and interdependent world (Moore 2016, 4) for the ‘last believers in an ordered universe’ (Keeley 1999, 123).”
BackgroundBelief in conspiracy theories, aggression, and attitudes towards political violencePreprint
Vegetti, F., & Littvay, L. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xwyjq · Cited by 1
More Than a Theory: Conspiracy Theorising As a Practical Tradition
Koper, A. J. (2024) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1177/14789299241292573 · Cited by 4
“In making this argument, Uscinski and Enders draw largely on philosophers like Coady (2003), along with MRX Dentith (2018, 2019), and Brian Keeley (1999, 2007), who have questioned the commonplace assumption that conspiracy theories are plainly false or irrational.”
Meyer, M., Enders, A., Klofstad, C. A., Stoler, J., & Uscinski, J. E. (2024) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-164 · Cited by 14
Conspiracy Theories and Religious Worldviews: Unraveling a Complex Relationship
Hesse, J., & Weidemann, C. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.55 · Cited by 6
“More recently, among others, Brian Keeley (1999; 2007), Michael Wood and Karen Douglas (2018) Bradley Franks, Adrian Bangerter and Martin Bauer (2013), and Glenn Bezalel (2021) claimed that there are important analogies between the structure of religious worldviews and conspiracy theories.”
InfluentialExploring psyop-based conspiracy theories on social media
Phillips, J. B. (2025) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2025.2483827 · Cited by 4
“This change is ‘ invariably nefarious ’ and is obscured by an o ffi cial explanation or ‘ cover story ’ , to borrow from Keeley (1999).”
InfluentialHermetic Histories: Divine Providence and Conspiracy Theory
Bennett, B. P. (2007) · Numen · doi:10.1163/156852707x185005 · Cited by 4
Conspiracy Theories and Muslim Brotherhood Antisemitism under Sadat
Santing, K. M. (2022) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel13020143 · Cited by 4
Conspiracy Theories and Rational Critique: A Kantian Procedural Approach
Schaab, J. D. (2022) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2022.2074883 · Cited by 4
“…debate is that, at least insofar as conspiracy theories are defined as theories that posit conspiracies , it is difficult to condemn belief in con-spiracy theories as rationally criticisable in general (Basham 2003; Coady 2007, 2018a, 2018b; Dentith 2016, 2018a; Keeley 1999; Pigden 1995, 2007).”
InfluentialConspiracy Theories, Scepticism, and Non-Liberal Politics
Matthews, F. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2177127 · Cited by 5
“…against ‘unwarranted conspiracy theories’ (UCTs) was made by Brian Keeley, who argued that UCTs suffer from the generalized fault that they entail an ‘almost nihilistic degree of skepticism and absurdism’ by disputing the trustworthiness of official institutions on a grand scale (Keeley 1999, 125).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Keeley, B. L.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Keeley, Brian L.
- ORCID
- Keeley, Brian L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Philosophy
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 109
- ISSN
- 0022-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1505155904
- Cited by
- 581
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 11.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, David Hume, miracles, epistemic warrant, explanation, Watergate, anachronism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review