Cited by 12Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementOil Palm Production and Sustainability

‘Greenlash’ and reactionary stakeholders in environmental governance: An analysis of soy farmers against zero deforestation in Brazil

Open access
Barbosa de Andrade Aragão, Rafaela, Bastos Lima, Mairon G., Burns, Georgette Leah, Ross, Helen, Biggs, Duan·2024·Forest Policy and Economics

Abstract

The rapid disappearance of tropical forests has led to increased adoption of sustainability policies and commitments. However, the implementation of zero-deforestation commitments remains inadequate, due to challenges such as resistance from beneficiaries of the status quo in agricultural commodity-exporting countries. This study focuses on soy farmers in Tocantins, a state in the Cerrado ecoregion of Brazil which has high rates of deforestation. A focus group was conducted to understand farmers' perspectives and responses to the emerging deforestation-free supply chains agenda. The farmers held various beliefs, including strong inclination towards conspiracy theories. They were skeptical towards environmental regulations and suspicious of foreign influences while rallying for greater autonomy and control over their (agri)business practices. Political ideologies, particularly those associated with the former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro, heavily influence the farmers' beliefs in conspiracy theories, posing a challenge to the expansion of zero-deforestation regulations. Preventing the spread of conspiracy theories among farmers is of utmost importance. Efforts should target leaders who promote such theories, and the improvement of communication that critiques underlying ideologies. Trusted stakeholders, such as environmental consultants and agronomists, play a key role by supporting farmers in adopting sustainable practices while addressing their concerns and skepticism. From a policy perspective, relying solely on importer countries’ regulations, such as the European due diligence requirements, may face challenges in halting deforestation. The reactionary profile of soy farmers requires a multifaceted governance response that involves Brazil’s national government to implement stricter national legislation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103267

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Barbosa de Andrade Aragão, R., Bastos Lima, M. G., Burns, G. L., Ross, H., & Biggs, D.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Northern Arizona University (US)
Venue
Forest Policy and Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
166
Pages
103267
ISSN
1389-9341 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399501209
Cited by
12
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Forest Policy and Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
Keywords
zero deforestation, environmental governance, conspiracy theories, land use change, Cerrado, Tocantins, agricultural expansion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review