‘Greenlash’ and reactionary stakeholders in environmental governance: An analysis of soy farmers against zero deforestation in Brazil
Open accessAbstract
The rapid disappearance of tropical forests has led to increased adoption of sustainability policies and commitments. However, the implementation of zero-deforestation commitments remains inadequate, due to challenges such as resistance from beneficiaries of the status quo in agricultural commodity-exporting countries. This study focuses on soy farmers in Tocantins, a state in the Cerrado ecoregion of Brazil which has high rates of deforestation. A focus group was conducted to understand farmers' perspectives and responses to the emerging deforestation-free supply chains agenda. The farmers held various beliefs, including strong inclination towards conspiracy theories. They were skeptical towards environmental regulations and suspicious of foreign influences while rallying for greater autonomy and control over their (agri)business practices. Political ideologies, particularly those associated with the former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro, heavily influence the farmers' beliefs in conspiracy theories, posing a challenge to the expansion of zero-deforestation regulations. Preventing the spread of conspiracy theories among farmers is of utmost importance. Efforts should target leaders who promote such theories, and the improvement of communication that critiques underlying ideologies. Trusted stakeholders, such as environmental consultants and agronomists, play a key role by supporting farmers in adopting sustainable practices while addressing their concerns and skepticism. From a policy perspective, relying solely on importer countries’ regulations, such as the European due diligence requirements, may face challenges in halting deforestation. The reactionary profile of soy farmers requires a multifaceted governance response that involves Brazil’s national government to implement stricter national legislation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Brazil's case, the new value assemblage involves adherence to a neoliberal and libertarian mindset associated with former president Jair Bolsonaro's far-right agenda that is antagonistic in particular to environmental regulations.
“In Brazil's case, that also involves adherence to a neoliberal and libertarian mindsetassociated with former president Jair Bolsonaro's far-right agendathat is antagonistic in particular to environmental regulations (Aragão et al., 2024;Delgado and Martins, 2024;Pompeia, 2024).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Aragão et al., 2024
Growing political conservatism and libertarianism, often espousing far-right agendas, and neoliberalism and reactionary attitudes towards environmental policy are clear in the Amazon.
“Growing political conservatism and libertarianism, often espousing far-right agendas ( Delgado and Martins, 2024) Neoliberalism and reactionary attitudes towards environmental policy (Aragão et al., 2024) in the Amazon are clear (Abramovay et al., 2021)”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Aragão et al., 2024
Cites
Understanding Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12568 · Cited by 1,511 · see citing works
The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721417718261 · Cited by 1,316 · see citing works
Speaking (Un–)Truth to Power: Conspiracy Mentality as A Generalised Political Attitude
Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1930 · Cited by 831 · see citing works
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12018 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Keeley, B. L. (1999) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2564659 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Increased conspiracy beliefs among ethnic and Muslim minorities
van Prooijen, J., Staman, J., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2018) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3442 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
Self-citation
- Authors
- Barbosa de Andrade Aragão, R., Bastos Lima, M. G., Burns, G. L., Ross, H., & Biggs, D.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Northern Arizona University (US)
- Venue
- Forest Policy and Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-09
- Volume
- 166
- Pages
- 103267
- ISSN
- 1389-9341 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4399501209
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Forest Policy and Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
- Keywords
- zero deforestation, environmental governance, conspiracy theories, land use change, Cerrado, Tocantins, agricultural expansion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review