Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PREDICTING SOCIAL-SEXUAL BEHAVIOR AT WORK: A CONTACT HYPOTHESIS.

Gutek, B. A., Cohen, A. G., Konrad, A. M.·1990·Academy of Management Journal
DOI 10.2307/256581
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study explored two competing hypotheses about social-sexual behavior at work, which we defined as any non-work-related behavior having a sexual component, including harassment, flirting, and m...

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/256581

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Gutek, B. A., Cohen, A. G., & Konrad, A. M.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
1990-09-01
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
560-577
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
DOI
10.2307/256581
OpenAlex
W2009052853
Cited by
254
References
35
FWCI
35.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PREDICTING SOCIAL-SEXUAL BEHAVIOR AT WORK: A CONTACT HYPOTHESIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/256581
The paper
Gutek, B. A., Cohen, A. G., & Konrad, A. M. (1990). PREDICTING SOCIAL-SEXUAL BEHAVIOR AT WORK: A CONTACT HYPOTHESIS. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/256581

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.